严娟

字号 + –

03 9月 2019

1
2
3
4
5

Author : 伤口世界

擅长造口护理、造口并发症处理，对外科术后感染伤口、肿瘤伤口、下肢动/静脉溃疡、失禁、瘘管、糖尿病溃疡足、放射性皮炎及其他慢性疑难伤口处理均具有丰富的经验。

国际造口/伤口失禁治疗师（ET），东莞康华医院普外科护士长，广东省护士协会第一届伤口造口失禁护士分会常委，广东省家庭医师协会护理分会第一届委员常务委员会委员，广东省家庭医生协会护理分会第一届委员，康华医院伤口/造口/失禁专科护理质量管理副组长。参与东莞市科技进步奖一等奖课题一项，主持及参与市级课题3项，发表科研论文4篇，2015年获广东省伤口造口PPT演讲比赛第一名，2017在东莞市护理学会举办“东莞市伤口护理病例大赛”中荣获优胜奖。东莞市伤口造口实习基地带教老师、

Latest from 伤口世界

K2 Content

Sex and APOE ε4 allele differences in longitudinal white matter microstructure in multiple cohorts of aging and Alzheimer’s disease 2025-08-26 00:00

Amalia Peterson1,2 | Aditi Sathe1 | Dimitrios Zaras1 | Yisu Yang1 | Alaina Durant1 | Kacie D. Deters3 | Niranjana Shashikumar1 | Kimberly R. Pechman1 | Michael E. Kim4 | Chenyu Gao5 | Nazirah Mohd Khairi5 | Zhiyuan Li5 | Tianyuan Yao4 | Yuankai Huo4,5 | Logan Dumitrescu1,2,6,7 | Katherine A. Gifford1,2 | Jo Ellen Wilson1,8,9 | Francis E. Cambronero1 | Shannon L. Risacher10,11 | Lori L. Beason-Held12 | Yang An12 | Konstantinos Arfanakis13,14,15 | Guray Erus16 | Christos Davatzikos16 | Duygu Tosun17 | Arthur W. Toga18 | Paul M. Thompson19 | Elizabeth C. Mormino20 | Mohamad Habes21 | Di Wang21 | Panpan Zhang1,22 | Kurt Schilling23,24 | Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) | The BIOCARD | Study Team | The Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP) | Marilyn Albert25 | Walter Kukull26 | Sarah A. Biber26 | Bennett A. Landman2,4,5,7,23,24,27 | Sterling C. Johnson28,29 | Julie Schneider14 | Lisa L. Barnes14 | David A. Bennett14 | Angela L. Jefferson1,2,4 | Susan M. Resnick12 | Andrew J. Saykin10,11 | Timothy J. Hohman1,2,6,7 | Derek B. Archer1,2,6,7

Correspondence

Derek B. Archer, Vanderbilt Memory and Alzheimer’s Center, 3319 West End Ave., Nashville, TN 37203, USA. Email: 该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。

Funding information

BAL, Grant/Award Number: R01-EB017230; DBA, Grant/Award Number: K01-AG073584; TJH, Grant/Award Number: U24-AG074855; Vanderbilt Clinical Translational Science Award, Grant/Award Numbers: UL1-TR000445, UL1-TR002243; Vanderbilt’s High-Performance Computer Cluster for Biomedical Research, Grant/Award Numbers: R01-AG080821, S10-OD023680; Alzheimer’s Association, Grant/Award Number: IIRG-08-88733(ALJ); NIH, Grant/Award Numbers: K01-EB032898 (KGS), R01-EB017230 (BAL), K01-AG073584 (DBA), U24-AG074855 (TJH), R01-AG059716 (TJH), UL1-TR000445 (Vanderbilt Clinical Translational Science Award), UL1-TR002243 (Vanderbilt Clinical Translational Science Award), S10-OD02380 (Vanderbilt’s High-Performance Computer Cluster for Biomedical Research), R01-AG080821 (MH), R01-AG034962 (ALJ), R01-AG056534 (ALJ), R01-AG062826 (KAG), U19-AG03655 (MA); Intramural NIH, Grant/Award Number: 75N95D22P00141

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

© 2024 The Author(s). Alzheimer’s & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer’s Association.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The effects of sex and apolipoprotein E (APOE)—Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk factors—on white matter microstructure are not well characterized.

METHODS: Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging data from nine well-established longitudinal cohorts of aging were free water (FW)–corrected and harmonized. This dataset included 4741 participants (age = 73.06 ± 9.75) with 9671 imaging sessions over time. FW and FW-corrected fractional anisotropy (FAFWcorr) were used to assess differences in white matter microstructure by sex and APOE ε4 carrier status.

RESULTS: Sex differences in FAFWcorr in projection tracts and APOE ε4 differences in FW limbic and occipital transcallosal tracts were most pronounced.

DISCUSSION: There are prominent differences in white matter microstructure by sex and APOE ε4 carrier status. This work adds to our understanding of disparities in AD. Additional work to understand the etiology of these differences is warranted.

KEYWORDS

aging, Alzheimer’s disease, sex differences, white matter disease

Highlights

∙ Sex and apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 carrier status relate to white matter microstruc tural integrity.

∙ Females generally have lower free water–corrected fractional anisotropy compared to males.

∙ APOE ε4 carriers tended to have higher free water than non-carriers.
Overview of Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and future clinical trials 2025-08-25 00:00

Michael W. Weiner1,2,3,4,5,6 | Shaveta Kanoria1,6 | Melanie J. Miller1,6 | Paul S. Aisen7 | Laurel A. Beckett8 | Catherine Conti1,6 | Adam Diaz1,6 | Derek Flenniken6 | Robert C. Green9 | Danielle J. Harvey8 | Clifford R. Jack Jr.10 | William Jagust11 | Edward B. Lee12 | John C. Morris13,14,15 | Kwangsik Nho16,17 | Rachel Nosheny1,4 | Ozioma C. Okonkwo18 | Richard J. Perrin13,14,15 | Ronald C. Petersen19 | Monica Rivera-Mindt20,21 | Andrew J. Saykin16,22 | Leslie M. Shaw23 | Arthur W. Toga24 | Duygu Tosun1,2 | Dallas P. Veitch1,6 for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

1 Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases, San Francisco, California, USA

2 Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

3 Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

4 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

5 Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

6 Northern California Institute for Research and Education (NCIRE), San Francisco, California, USA

7 Alzheimer’s Therapeutic Research Institute, University of Southern California, San Diego, California, USA

8 Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Medical Sciences 1C, Davis, California, USA

9 Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Broad Institute Ariadne Labs and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

10 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

11 Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA

12 Translational Neuropathology Research Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of

Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

13 Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA

14 Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA

15 Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

16 Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and the Indiana Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

17 Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

18 Wisconsin Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center and Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

19 Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

20 Department of Psychology, Latin American and Latino Studies Institute, African and African American Studies, Fordham University, Bronx, New York, USA

21 Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA

22 Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

23 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and the PENN Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Center for Neurodegenerative Research, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA

24 Laboratory of Neuro Imaging, Institute of Neuroimaging and Informatics, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, San Diego, California, USA

Correspondence

Michael W. Weiner, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases, 4150 Clement St, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA. Email: 该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。 Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (adni.loni.usc.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data. Some ADNI investigators participated in analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp content/uploads/how_to_apply/ ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pd

Funding information

NIH, Grant/Award Number: U19 -AG 024904; National Institute on Aging, Grant/Award Number: U19AG024904

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

© 2024 The Author(s). Alzheimer’s & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer’s Association.

Abstract

The overall goal of the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is to opti mize and validate biomarkers for clinical trials while sharing all data and biofluid samples with the global scientific community. ADNI has been instrumental in stan dardizing and validating amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. ADNI data were used for the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the Fujirebio and Roche Elecsys cerebrospinal fluid diagnostic tests. Additionally, ADNI provided data for the trials of the FDA-approved treatments aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab. More than 6000 scientific papers have been published using ADNI data, reflecting ADNI’s promotion of open science and data sharing. Despite its enormous success, ADNI has some limitations, particularly in generalizing its data and findings to the entire US/Canadian population. This introduction provides a historical overview of ADNI and highlights its significant accomplishments and future vision to pioneer “the clinical trial of the future” focusing on demographic inclusivity.

KEYWORDS

Alzheimer’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers, Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Alzheimer’s disease progression, amyloid, Lab oratory of Neuro Imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, neurodegeneration, positron emission tomography, post-traumatic stress disorder, tau, underrepresented populations

Highlights

∙ The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) introduced a novel model for public-private partnerships and data sharing.

∙ It successfully validated amyloid and Tau PET imaging, as well as CSF and plasma biomarkers, for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease.

∙ ADNI generated and disseminated vital data for designing AD clinical trials.
APOE ε4–associated heterogeneity of neuroimaging biomarkers across the Alzheimer’s disease continuum 2025-08-22 00:00

Jason Mares1,2 Gautam Kumar1,3,4 Anurag Sharma1,3 Sheina Emrani5 Laura Beth McIntire6 Jia Guo7,8 Vilas Menon1,2 Tal Nuriel1,3 for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

1 Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA

2 Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA

3 Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA

4 Department of Neurobiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

5 Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

6 Lipidomics and Biomarker Discovery Lab, Brain Health Imaging Institute, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA

7 Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA

8 Zuckerman Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA

Correspondence

Tal Nuriel, Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University, 630 W. 168th St., P&S 12-420E, New York, NY 10032, USA. Email: 该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。 The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (adni.loni.usc.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data, but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report.

Funding information

NIA, Grant/Award Numbers: K01 AG061264, R01 AG070202, R01 AG078800, R01 AG066831, U19 AG024904 This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

© 2025 The Author(s). Alzheimer’s & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer’s Association

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: While the role of apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 in Alzheimer’s dis ease (AD) susceptibility has been studied extensively, much less is known about the differences in disease presentation in APOE ε4 carriers versus non-carriers.

METHODS: To help elucidate these differences, we performed a broad analysis com paring the regional levels of six different neuroimaging biomarkers in the brains of APOE ε4 carriers versus non-carriers who participated in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI).

RESULTS:We observed significant APOE ε4–associated heterogeneity in regional amy loid beta deposition, tau accumulation, glucose uptake, brain volume, cerebral blood flow, and white matter hyperintensities within each AD diagnostic group. We also observed important APOE ε4–associated differences in cognitively unimpaired indi viduals who converted to mild cognitive impairment/AD versus those who did not

DISCUSSION: This observed heterogeneity in neuroimaging biomarkers between APOE ε4 carriers versus non-carriers may have important implications regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of AD in different subpopulations.

KEYWORDS

Alzheimer’s disease, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, apolipoprotein E, biomarkers, heterogeneity, neuroimaging

Highlights

∙ An extensive study was performed on the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4–associated heterogeneity in neuroimaging biomarkers from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neu roimaging Initiative.

∙ Robust APOE ε4–associated increases in amyloid beta (Aβ) deposition throughout the brain, in every diagnostic group, were observed.

∙ APOE ε4–associated increases in tau pathology, decreases in glucose uptake, and increases in brain atrophy, which expand in regional scope and magnitude with disease progression, were observed.

∙ Significant sex- and age-related differences in APOE ε4–associated neuroimaging biomarker heterogeneity, with overall increases in pathological presentation in female APOE ε4 carriers, were observed.

∙ Regional differences in Aβ deposition, tau accumulation, glucose uptake, ventricle size, and white matter hyperintensities were observed in cognitively normal partic ipants who converted to mild cognitive impairment/Alzheimer’s disease, which may hold potential predictive value.

Custom Mod Mega1

主任医师、教授、博导，南方医科大学第三附属医院（广东省骨科医院）院长

严娟

Latest from 伤口世界

学术会议

伤口世界提示

Custom Mod Mega1

主任医师、教授、博导，南方医科大学第三附属医院（广东省骨科医院）院长

严娟

Latest from 伤口世界

消息订阅

学术会议

伤口世界提示