大湾区慢性创面医护康标准化体系建设联盟,《中国科技论文》体表外科卷编辑委员会,黄广涛1,吴 军1,郇京宁1,2
(1.深圳大学第一附属医院(深圳市第二人民医院)烧伤整形科,广东深圳518000;2.上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院烧伤整形与创面修复科,上海200011)
摘要:负压封闭引流技术(negative pressure wound therapy, NPWT)自2017年国内首部烧伤外科应用专家共识发布以来,其技术类型与临床应用范围均取得了显著拓展。特别是在促进各类急慢性创面愈合及预防外科手术部位感染方面,已累积了大量高质量循证证据。为整合国内外最新研究成果与临床实践经验,规范操作标准,提升治疗水平,国内创面修复相关多学科领域的专家共同撰写了本更新版共识。本共识汇聚了国内多位在创面相关的多学科领域的专家,结合国内外最新研究成果,遵循严谨的循证医学原则,采用系统综述方法,聚焦于NPWT的技术分类、适应症、参数优化及并发症处理等核心议题。工作小组系统检索了PubMed、Web of Science、IEEE Xplore及中国知网等数据库中2015—2025年相关文献,共获得791篇。经去重、筛选,并根据纳入标准(临床研究、随机对照试验、meta分析及相关共识等)最终纳入210篇文献进行证据综合与评价。本共识旨在为创面修复相关学科的临床医生提供基于最新证据、统一且可操作的治疗方案与技术规范。共识内容充分结合了我国临床实践的现状与需求,以期推动NPWT在国内的合理、规范及高效应用,最终惠及广大患者。
关键词:负压封闭引流技术;手术部位感染;创面修复;手术切口并发症
SAMANTHA HOLLOWAY Academic Editor, Wounds UK; Reader, Programme Director, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff
Discussing chronic wounds, Ferris and Harding (2020) proposed that chronic wounds could be considered an additional frailty syndrome based partly on the notion of skin failure (Langemo and Black 2010) in older age, as well as the impact of concomitant conditions that impact wound healing. This presents an interesting viewpoint when you consider that the other five frailty syndromes include falls, immobility, delirium, incontinence and susceptibility to side effects of medication (Turner, 2014). It is not uncommon to be treating an individual with a wound that was originally sustained as an injury related to a fall or trip, for example a skin tear which if not treated promptly can develop into a hard-to-heal, chronic wound. Equally immobility is the highest risk factor for pressure ulcers (PU) and incontinence is a risk factor for moisture associated skin damage (MASD). Lastly side effects of medication such as corticosteroids and immunosuppressants can delay wound healing by delaying inflammatory cells responses, as well as granulation tissue formation. These aspects support the idea that the presence of a chronic wound might also be representative of frailty.
The global syndrome of ‘frailty’, represents a decreased physiologic reserve, (Rockwood and Mitnitski (2007). In combination with the impact that comorbidities can have on an individual, in particular an increased vulnerability to poorer health outcomes (Espaulella-Ferrer et al, 2021), a clear picture begins to emerge of many of the patients seen in clinical practice who may be in a cycle of physiological frailty exacerbated by other conditions including the presence of a chronic wound. So how can we improve the identification of frailty in individuals with chronic wounds? I’m sure it won’t surprise you if I say that assessment is key, but how should frailty be assessed? There are specific tools to diagnose and assess frailty but these need to be used by trained health and social care individuals to ensure the assessment is accurate as there is a risk of misdiagnosing or even missing aspects of frailty syndrome. Early warning signs or indicators of frailty in a patient with a wound that should trigger an assessment are represented in the following scenario.
Think about an older person (aged 65+) that you may have cared for, they are being managed for recurrence of a venous leg ulcer (VLU). This person was previously mobile, very steady on their feet, able to attend the clinic for compression bandage changes and very communicative. At the next clinic visit you notice that their gait is more unsteady, there are signs of urinary incontinence and they’re less coherent than usual. There is an overall sense that ‘something’s not quite right’. It’s likely that based on your concerns you would make a referral to the patient’s GP in the first instance that is of course the most appropriate course of action. However, the referral should make specific mention of the need for a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA; British Geriatrics Society, 2019) as this would help to establish the individual’s medical, psychological and functional capabilities to facilitate the development of a coordinated and integrated plan of care (NICE 2016). You might be thinking, but isn’t this reflective of what multidisciplinary teams (MDT) do anyway? I would argue not necessarily, as MDT do not always function in an interdisciplinary/interagency way, instead the focus may be on what the different health and social care professionals can offer within a team. In contrast, the CGA process considers specific domains including; physical assessment, functional, social and environmental assessment, psychological components and a medication review (British Geriatric Society, 2019). Identification of frailty at an earlier stage could help to mitigate or even prevent issues at a later stage (Ferris and Harding 2020).
My own observations are that in relation to individuals with wounds there is a positive move towards multidisciplinary team (MDT) working, person-centred care and promotion of shared decision-making. However I think we may be missing early signs of frailty in some patients, or perhaps these signs are recognised but we may not be making the best use of our health and social care colleagues who are trained in the assessment of frailty and who could make a positive contribution to early interventions and long-term support of this syndrome. You may be reading this and thinking, but we are doing this! If so then please get in touch to tell us what you’re doing in this area, we’d love to be able to share examples of good practice and case studies that reflect management of frailty in individuals with wounds.
REFERENCE
1. British Geriatric Society (2019) CGA in Primary Care Settings: The elements of the CGA process. BGS. Available from: https://www. bgs.org.uk/resources/2-cga-in-primary-care-settings-the elements-of-the-cga-process (accessed 29 April 2022)
2. Espaulella-Ferrer M, Espaulella-Panicot J, Noell-Boix R, et al (2021) Assessment of frailty in elderly patients attending a multidisciplinary wound care centre: a cohort study. BMC Geriatr 18;21(1):727. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02676-y. PMID: 34922487; PMCID: PMC8684133.
3. Ferris AE, Harding KG. (2020) Are chronic wounds a feature of frailty? Br J Gen Pract 30;70(694):256-257. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X709829. PMID: 32354831; PMCID: PMC7194753.
4. Langemo DK, Black J, (2010) National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure ulcers in individuals receiving palliative care: a National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel white paper. Adv Skin Wound Care 23(2):59–72.
5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2016) Transition between inpatient hospital settings and community or care home settings for adults with social care needs. Quality standard [qs136]. NICE. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs136/chapter/quality statement-2-comprehensive-geriatric-assessment (a cessed 29 April 2022)
6. Rockwood K, Mitnitski A. (2007) Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 62(7):722-7. doi: 10.1093/ gerona/62.7.722. PMID: 17634318.
7. Turner G (2014) Introduction to Frailty, Fit for Frailty Part 1. British Geriatrics Society https://www.bgs.org.uk/resources/ introduction-to-frailty (accessed 29 April 2022)
This article is excerped from the Wounds UK | Vol 18 | No 2 | 2022 by Wound World.
伤口世界平台生态圈,以“关爱人间所有伤口患者”为愿景,连接、整合和拓展线上和线下的管理慢性伤口的资源,倡导远程、就近和居家管理慢性伤口,解决伤口专家的碎片化时间的价值创造、诊疗经验的裂变复制、和患者的就近、居家和低成本管理慢性伤口的问题。
2019广东省医疗行业协会伤口管理分会年会
扫一扫了解详情:
任何关于疾病的建议都不能替代执业医师的面对面诊断。所有门诊时间仅供参考,最终以医院当日公布为准。
网友、医生言论仅代表其个人观点,不代表本站同意其说法,请谨慎参阅,本站不承担由此引起的法律责任。