版权归中华医学会所有。
未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章。
引用本文:简喜超, 简扬, 邓呈亮. 2025版《中国糖尿病足防治实践指南》解读[J]. 中华医学美学美容杂志, 2026, 32(2): 99-103. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114657-20251215-00266.
通信作者:邓呈亮,Email:该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。
Athina Stamati1 · Athanasios Christoforidis2
Received: 7 October 2024 / Accepted: 31 December 2024 / Published online: 10 January 2025 © The Author(s) 2025
Abstract
Aims To assess the efficacy and safety of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems compared to standard care in managing glycaemic control during pregnancy in women with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM).
Methods We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, registries and conference abstracts up to June 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing AID to standard care in pregnant women with T1DM. We con-ducted random effects meta-analyses for % of 24-h time in range of 63–140 mg/dL (TIR), time in hyperglycaemia (>140 mg/ dl and>180 mg/dL), hypoglycaemia (<63 mg/dl and<54 mg/dL), total insulin dose (units/kg/day), glycemic variability (%), changes in HbA1c (%), maternal and fetal outcomes.
Results Thirteen studies (450 participants) were included. AID significantly increased TIR (Mean difference, MD 7.01%, 95% CI 3.72–10.30) and reduced time in hyperglycaemia>140 mg/dL and>180 mg/dL (MD – 5.09%, 95% CI – 9.41 to – 0.78 and MD – 2.44%, 95% CI – 4.69 to – 0.20, respectively). Additionally, glycaemic variability was significantly reduced (MD – 1.66%, 95% CI – 2.73 to – 0.58). Other outcomes did not differ significantly.
Conclusion AID systems effectively improve glycaemic control during pregnancy in women with T1DM by increasing TIR and reducing hyperglycaemia without any observed adverse short-term effects on maternal and fetal outcomes.
Keywords Automated insulin delivery · Pregnancy · Type 1 diabetes mellitus · Systematic review · Meta-analysis
Steven Percival
BSc, PGCE, MSc, MSc, PhD, CEO, 5D Health Protection Group Ltd, Professor (hon), School of Medicine, University of Manchester, UK
Leanne Atkin
PhD MHSc, RGN, Vascular Nurse Consultant/Lecturer Practitioner, Mid Yorks NHS Trust, University of Huddersfield, UK
Key words
Declarations
The symposium and report were supported by Flen Health.
This article is based on a Made Easy workshop held at the Wounds UK Annual Conference in Harrogate, UK, on 6th November 2023. The workshop and this report were sponsored by Flen Health.
Steven Percival opened the workshop by introducing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and methods to reduce AMR, and Leanne Atkin went on to introduce Flaminal®, an enzyme alginogel, and gave guidance on managing wounds in difficult-to-dress areas.
Antimicrobials
Antimicrobials, including biocides, antibiotics, antiseptics, disinfectants, antivirals, antifungals and antiparasitics, are products or medicines used to prevent and treat infections in humans, animals and plants (World Health Organization [WHO], 2021).
Biocides
Biocides, such as QAC (algaecide), function to destroy, deter, render harmless or exert a controlling effect on any harmful organism through chemical or biological means.
Antibiotics
Antibiotics, such as penicillin, are the only antimicrobial compounds that can also be administered systemically. They exhibit selectivity by targeting specific sites within bacterial cells, proving toxic and effective in destroying microbes within the body. However, the widespread use of topically and systemically administered antibiotics often leads to the development of resistance (Nair et al, 2023).
Antiseptics
Antiseptics, such as alcohol and silver, are topical antimicrobial agents with broad spectrum activity that inhibit the growth and multiplication of microorganisms and can also kill them. The impact on human cells is concentration-dependent, with higher concentrations potentially exhibiting toxic effects. However, modern antiseptics generally demonstrate good tissue compatibility, and the development of resistance to topical antiseptics is considered less common compared to antibiotic resistance (Haesler et al, 2022).
Disinfectants
Disinfectants, such as chlorine, polyhexamethylene biguanide and peracetic acid, are substances that exhibit non-selective antimicrobial activity and are recommended by the manufacturer for application to nonliving objects to kill microorganisms such as bacteria, viruses and fungi (IWII, 2022).
Introducing antimicrobial resistance (AMR)
AMR occurs when bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites change over time and no longer respond to medicines making infections progressively more difficult or even impossible to treat (WHO, 2021).
AMR is a growing public health challenge worldwide and is recognised as one of the top 10 threats to global health (WHO, 2021). It is estimated to be responsible for at least 10 million deaths annually and will cost approximately $100–200 trillion USD globally by 2050 (Interagency Coordinating Group on Antimicrobial Resistance, 2019).
Causes of AMR include:
Why is AMR a concern?
Resistant microorganisms can potentially lead to the spread of resistance in both the community and healthcare facilities — e.g. a patient with AMR can transmit resistant microorganisms to other patients through poor hygiene practices, close proximity and contaminated objects, such as unchanged hospital bed sheets shared among different patients. See Box 1 for additional consequences of AMR.
Mechanisms of resistance development
Microorganisms can possess intrinsic or innate resistance properties embedded in their DNA, or they can acquire resistance through mutations. Additionally, resistance can be developed through the acquisition of plasmids (self-replicating, extrachromosomal DNA) or transposons (plasmid integrating or chromosomal, transmissible DNA cassettes), which typically occur in a biofilm (McDonnell and Russell, 1999).
Biofilm
Biofilms are complex polymicrobial communities, attached either to each other or to a biotic or abiotic surface (not necessarily a solid surface), and become encased within an extracellular polymeric substance. They can increase the likelihood of a wound becoming infected and prevent wound closure (Wolcott et al, 2016; Kadam et al, 2019).
Biofilms can’t be seen with the naked eye; however, the consequences of unmanaged biofilms can look like:
Persister cells and biofilm
Persister cells, found within biofilms, exhibit resistance to antibiotics and are implicated in the persistence of chronic infections. While antimicrobials kill the majority of cells, persister cells remain viable even in the presence of antimicrobials and contribute to the repopulation of biofilms when the concentration of antimicrobials decreases (Lewis, 2010; Wood, 2013).
Methods to reduce AMR:
Wound assessment
As part of the immediate care for leg ulcers, the first step involves wound bed preparation (National Wound Care Strategy Programme, 2023). It is recommended to use frameworks that offer a systematic approach to wound bed assessment – such as the T.I.M.E. principle – Tissue, Infection, Moisture and Edges of the wound (Schultz et al, 2003).
Flaminal®
Flaminal® is a primary wound dressing, categorised as an enzyme alginogel. Its unique composition and modes of action make Flaminal® suitable for addressing all aspects of T.I.M.E. [Table 1], eliminating the need for multiple products. It can be used throughout all stages in the wound infection continuum (International Wound Infection Institute, 2022) and offers continuous wound debridement, broad-spectrum antibacterial activity without cytotoxicity [Box 2], absorption of excess exudate, maintenance of a moist healing environment, and protection to the wound edges and epithelial cells (Beele et al, 2012).
Mechanisms of action
Flaminal® is composed of a hydrated alginate matrix alongside its unique antimicrobial GLG enzyme system — glucose oxidase combined with lactoperoxidase stabilised by guaiacol (De Smet, 2009; Cooper, 2013). These two naturally occurring enzymes — lactoperoxidase found in breast milk and secretions of exocrine glands such as saliva, tears and cervical mucus — work together with glucose oxidase to form free oxygen radicals via hydrogen peroxide. This process is similar to the action of our innate white cell defences, leading to the destruction of the cell walls of absorbed bacteria (White, 2006).
Flaminal® is available in two formulations:
Managing difficult-to-dress wounds
Flaminal® is versatile and can be applied to various wound aetiologies, types and conditions — see Box 3 for examples.
Application methods include direct application from the tube in shallow wounds, onto secondary dressings in larger wounds – e.g. leg ulcers, with a syringe or nozzle for deep cavity wounds, wound edges or toes [Figure 1 and 2], and with a spatula for large wounds or burn wounds.
Conclusion
The widespread and inappropriate use of antimicrobials to treat both acute and chronic wounds, coupled with spreading and systemic infections, has significantly contributed to the rise of AMR. The growing concern about AMR and its associated risks, including prolonged hospital stays and increased mortality, highlights the need for innovative antimicrobial wound care alternatives with minimal cytotoxicity, such as Flaminal®.
Flaminal® is an enzyme alginogel, designed as a singular product with multiple modes of action to comprehensively address all aspects of T.I.M.E. It effectively mitigates the complexity associated with multiple product choices and results in a more consistent and standardised approach to wound care.
References
1. Beele H, Durante C, Kerihuel JC (2012) Expert Consensus on a new enzyme alginogel. Wounds UK 8(1):64–73
2. Cooper RA (2013) Inhibition of biofilms by glucose oxidase, lactoperoxidase and guaiacol: the active antibacterial component in an enzyme alginogel. Int Wound J 10:630–7
3. De Smet K et al (2009) Pre-clinical evaluation of a new antimicrobial enzyme for the control of wound bioburden. Wounds 21:65–73
4. Flen Health (2021) Long-term efficacy of GLG antimicrobial properties. Internal data on file
5. Gottrup F, Apelqvist J, Bjarnsholt T et al (2013) J Wound Care 22(5): S1–92
6. Haesler E, Swanson T, Ousey K et al (2022) Establishing a consensus on wound infection definitions. J Wound Care 31(12):48-S59
7. Harding K, Dowsett C, Fias L (2015) Simplifying venous leg ulcer management. Consensus recommendations. Wounds International
8. Interagency Coordinating Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (2019) Report to the Secretary-General of the United Nations
9. International Wound Infection Institute (2022) Wound Infection in Clinical Practice. Wounds International
10. Jones and Oates (2018) TIME to assess wounds- a clinical evaluation of Flaminal. Wounds UK 14(3)
11. Kadam S, Shai S, Shahane A, Kaushik KS (2019) Recent advances in non-conventional antimicrobial approaches for chronic wound biofilms: have we found the ‘Chink in the armor’? Biomedicine 7(2):3
12. Lewis K (2010) Persister cells. Annual Review of Microbiology 64:357–372
13. McDonnell G and Russell, AD (1999) Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clinical microbiology reviews 12(1): 147–179
14. National Wound Care Strategy Programme (2023) Leg ulcer recommendations. https:// www.nationalwoundcarestrategy.net/ wp-content/uploads/2023/08/NWCSP-Leg-Ulcer Recommendations-1.8.2023.pdf
15. Nair HKR, Mrozikiewicz-Rakowska B, Pinto DS et al (2023) International Consensus Document: Use of wound antiseptics in practice. Wounds International
16. Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, Falanga V et al (2003) Wound bed preparation: A systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair Regen 11(2):1-28
17. Storck M et al (2022) Alginols in wound therapy: properties and reimbursability. WUNDmanagement
18. White R (2006) Flaminal®: a novel approach to wound bioburden control. Wounds UK 2:64 –9
19. Wolcott RD, Hanson JD, Rees EJ et al (2016) Analysis of the chronic wound microbiota of 2,963 patients by 16S rDNA pyrosequencing. Wound Repair Regen 24(1):163-74
20. Wood TK, Knabel SJ, Kwan BW (2013) Bacterial persister cell formation and dormancy. Appl Environ Microbiol 79(23):7116-21
21. World Health Organization (2021) Antimicrobial resistance – fact sheet https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/ detail/antimicrobial-resistance
22. Wounds UK (2022) Best Practice Statement: Holistic management of venous leg ulceration (second edition). Wounds UK
This article is excerpted from the Wounds UK 2024 | Volume: 20 Issue: 1 by Wound World.
伤口世界平台生态圈,以“关爱人间所有伤口患者”为愿景,连接、整合和拓展线上和线下的管理慢性伤口的资源,倡导远程、就近和居家管理慢性伤口,解决伤口专家的碎片化时间的价值创造、诊疗经验的裂变复制、和患者的就近、居家和低成本管理慢性伤口的问题。
2019广东省医疗行业协会伤口管理分会年会
扫一扫了解详情:
任何关于疾病的建议都不能替代执业医师的面对面诊断。所有门诊时间仅供参考,最终以医院当日公布为准。
网友、医生言论仅代表其个人观点,不代表本站同意其说法,请谨慎参阅,本站不承担由此引起的法律责任。