大湾区慢性创面医护康标准化体系建设联盟,《中国科技论文》体表外科卷编辑委员会,黄广涛1,吴 军1,郇京宁1,2
(1.深圳大学第一附属医院(深圳市第二人民医院)烧伤整形科,广东深圳518000;2.上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院烧伤整形与创面修复科,上海200011)
摘要:负压封闭引流技术(negative pressure wound therapy, NPWT)自2017年国内首部烧伤外科应用专家共识发布以来,其技术类型与临床应用范围均取得了显著拓展。特别是在促进各类急慢性创面愈合及预防外科手术部位感染方面,已累积了大量高质量循证证据。为整合国内外最新研究成果与临床实践经验,规范操作标准,提升治疗水平,国内创面修复相关多学科领域的专家共同撰写了本更新版共识。本共识汇聚了国内多位在创面相关的多学科领域的专家,结合国内外最新研究成果,遵循严谨的循证医学原则,采用系统综述方法,聚焦于NPWT的技术分类、适应症、参数优化及并发症处理等核心议题。工作小组系统检索了PubMed、Web of Science、IEEE Xplore及中国知网等数据库中2015—2025年相关文献,共获得791篇。经去重、筛选,并根据纳入标准(临床研究、随机对照试验、meta分析及相关共识等)最终纳入210篇文献进行证据综合与评价。本共识旨在为创面修复相关学科的临床医生提供基于最新证据、统一且可操作的治疗方案与技术规范。共识内容充分结合了我国临床实践的现状与需求,以期推动NPWT在国内的合理、规范及高效应用,最终惠及广大患者。
关键词:负压封闭引流技术;手术部位感染;创面修复;手术切口并发症
Yesica Y. Quiroz 1 , Enver Moncada 2 , Erika Llorens 3 , Ivan Schwartzmann 4 , Jorge Caffarati 5 , Anna Bujons *
Summary
Introduction
Paratesticular sarcoma is an aggressive malignant tumor of mesenchymal origin. The rhabdo-myosarcoma is the most common among children. Rhabdomyosarcoma treatment consists of surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Prognosic depends on local recurrence and distant metastasis.
Material and methods
We present the case of a 16-year-old male, who in April 2016 underwent right radical orchiectomy surgery by testicular mass rapidly evolving, with pathological results indicating a paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma. The extension study showed a precaval adenopathy suggestive of lymph node metastasis, therefore it was a high-grade rhabdomyosarcoma. There was an appropriate response after chemotherapy (Protocol EpSSG RMS2005) and we decided to perform a robotic.
Results
We performed a transperitoneal approach with 8 mm trocar and 12 mm optica trocar. We accessed the retroperitoneal space through a latero-colic incision. Then we performed a craniocaudal lymph node dissection until the aortic bifurcation. The surgical time was 240 min with a blood loss of 200 ml. There were no complications. The patient was discharged on the fourth day after surgery. Pathology showed metastasis of rhabdomyosarcoma without capsular rupture. After two months, we placed the left testicle into inguinal canal prior to radiotherapy.
Conclusions
Robotic lymph node metastasis lymphadenectomy from paratesticular sarcomas is a feasible treatment with the advantage of minimally invasive surgery and acceptable morbidity.
Authors
Marcia Nusgart
Keywords
quality measures
CMS
physician compare
Issue: Volume 65-Issue 10-October 2019-ISSN 2640-5245
Report
Three (3) wound care quality measures developed by the Alliance of Wound Care Stakeholders and the US Wound Registry (USWR) are now included on the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) Physician Compare, a website created to enable patients to make informed decisions when selecting health care providers who participate in Medicare by comparing quality data between individual physicians, group practices, and Accountable Care Organizations. The quality performance data publicly available on the site also incentivize clinicians to maximize their performance scores.
The updated Physician Compare site now incorporates 2017 Quality Payment Program data and includes, for the first time, performance data on 12 standard quality measures from the Merit Based Incentive Payment Program (MIPS) and 11 specialty-specific measures developed by various Qualified Clinical Data Registries (QCDRs).
Nearly every medical specialty has launched a QCDR to facilitate MIPS participation by their members and to develop quality measures relevant to their patients and practice. Among the 40+ medical specialty registries, only 6 QCDRs had specialty-specific measures selected by the CMS for inclusion on
Physician Compare. Of the 11 total QCDR specialty measures that were chosen, 3 are wound care measures; these include:
1) adequate offloading of diabetic foot ulcer at each treatment visit;
2) adequate compression of venous leg ulcers at each treatment visit; and
3) vascular assessment of patients with chronic leg ulcers.
No other QCDR had 3 measures selected for the Physician Compare site, suggesting a growing appreciation by the CMS of the impact of diabetic foot and venous leg ulcers on Medicare beneficiaries.
To be eligible for inclusion on the CMS Physician Compare website, a quality measure must have been in use for at least 3 years in order to for the CMS to establish national benchmark rates, and it must have been reported by a sufficient number of practitioners. Thus, at least 3 years of dedicated work by a QCDR is required for a measure to be eligible for Physician Compare. Other organizations whose QCDR measures were selected include the American Academy of Neurology, the Anesthesia Business Group, the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Primary (Care) Practice Research Network — organizations that represent powerful, well-organized, and well-funded specialties.
Because wound management is not a recognized subspecialty, when the QCDR initiative began in 2014, the CMS agreed (after much proactive advocacy) for the Alliance of Wound Care Stakeholders to act in lieu of a specialty society, given its role as a convener of all the clinical associations relevant to wound management. The prominent positioning of wound management quality measures on the newly updated Physician Compare site is the result of many years of work by the Alliance and USWR to increase CMS’ attention to chronic wound care and to improve the quality of care provided to patients. With the inclusion of this data on the Physician Compare site,
consumers can now consider this information when selecting health care providers.
The easily viewable information is designed to educate patients. Downloadable files also are accessible to clinicians and have reportedly also been used by private payers in a variety of ways (eg, to calculate Value Based Purchasing calculations), demonstrating the value of comparative performance data across a range of stakeholders.
The USWR facilitates merit-based payment reporting for wound care practitioners and develops specialty-specific quality measures and clinical practice improvement activities relevant to wound management and nutrition. The Alliance of Wound Care Stakeholders is an association of physician and clinical organizations focused on promoting quality care and access to procedures and technologies for patients with wounds through advocacy and educational outreach in the regulatory, legislative, and public arenas. For more information, please visit: woundcarestakeholders.org and uswoundregistry.com.
伤口世界平台生态圈,以“关爱人间所有伤口患者”为愿景,连接、整合和拓展线上和线下的管理慢性伤口的资源,倡导远程、就近和居家管理慢性伤口,解决伤口专家的碎片化时间的价值创造、诊疗经验的裂变复制、和患者的就近、居家和低成本管理慢性伤口的问题。
2019广东省医疗行业协会伤口管理分会年会
扫一扫了解详情:
任何关于疾病的建议都不能替代执业医师的面对面诊断。所有门诊时间仅供参考,最终以医院当日公布为准。
网友、医生言论仅代表其个人观点,不代表本站同意其说法,请谨慎参阅,本站不承担由此引起的法律责任。