大湾区慢性创面医护康标准化体系建设联盟,《中国科技论文》体表外科卷编辑委员会,黄广涛1,吴 军1,郇京宁1,2
(1.深圳大学第一附属医院(深圳市第二人民医院)烧伤整形科,广东深圳518000;2.上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院烧伤整形与创面修复科,上海200011)
摘要:负压封闭引流技术(negative pressure wound therapy, NPWT)自2017年国内首部烧伤外科应用专家共识发布以来,其技术类型与临床应用范围均取得了显著拓展。特别是在促进各类急慢性创面愈合及预防外科手术部位感染方面,已累积了大量高质量循证证据。为整合国内外最新研究成果与临床实践经验,规范操作标准,提升治疗水平,国内创面修复相关多学科领域的专家共同撰写了本更新版共识。本共识汇聚了国内多位在创面相关的多学科领域的专家,结合国内外最新研究成果,遵循严谨的循证医学原则,采用系统综述方法,聚焦于NPWT的技术分类、适应症、参数优化及并发症处理等核心议题。工作小组系统检索了PubMed、Web of Science、IEEE Xplore及中国知网等数据库中2015—2025年相关文献,共获得791篇。经去重、筛选,并根据纳入标准(临床研究、随机对照试验、meta分析及相关共识等)最终纳入210篇文献进行证据综合与评价。本共识旨在为创面修复相关学科的临床医生提供基于最新证据、统一且可操作的治疗方案与技术规范。共识内容充分结合了我国临床实践的现状与需求,以期推动NPWT在国内的合理、规范及高效应用,最终惠及广大患者。
关键词:负压封闭引流技术;手术部位感染;创面修复;手术切口并发症
Yesica Y. Quiroz 1 , Enver Moncada 2 , Erika Llorens 3 , Ivan Schwartzmann 4 , Jorge Caffarati 5 , Anna Bujons *
Summary
Introduction
Paratesticular sarcoma is an aggressive malignant tumor of mesenchymal origin. The rhabdo-myosarcoma is the most common among children. Rhabdomyosarcoma treatment consists of surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Prognosic depends on local recurrence and distant metastasis.
Material and methods
We present the case of a 16-year-old male, who in April 2016 underwent right radical orchiectomy surgery by testicular mass rapidly evolving, with pathological results indicating a paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma. The extension study showed a precaval adenopathy suggestive of lymph node metastasis, therefore it was a high-grade rhabdomyosarcoma. There was an appropriate response after chemotherapy (Protocol EpSSG RMS2005) and we decided to perform a robotic.
Results
We performed a transperitoneal approach with 8 mm trocar and 12 mm optica trocar. We accessed the retroperitoneal space through a latero-colic incision. Then we performed a craniocaudal lymph node dissection until the aortic bifurcation. The surgical time was 240 min with a blood loss of 200 ml. There were no complications. The patient was discharged on the fourth day after surgery. Pathology showed metastasis of rhabdomyosarcoma without capsular rupture. After two months, we placed the left testicle into inguinal canal prior to radiotherapy.
Conclusions
Robotic lymph node metastasis lymphadenectomy from paratesticular sarcomas is a feasible treatment with the advantage of minimally invasive surgery and acceptable morbidity.
Authors
Lia van Rijswijk
Issue: Volume 64 - Issue 12 - December 2018 ISSN 1943-2720
Index: Ostomy Wound Manage. 2018;64(12):6-7.
Login or Register to download PDF
Just as sure as winter arrives, so do concerns about next years’ health insurance premiums — which providers may (or may not) be included and what may (or may not) be covered. This is the time of year we may remember lofty campaign promises to reduce health care costs and make health care affordable/accessible and then realize that when all is said and done, a lot more is said than done. But let’s start with some encouraging developments. Patient protection elements of the 2010 health insurance law, which included the elimination of lifetime caps, helped cut the number of personal bankruptcies in the United States by about 50% since 2010.1 During that same time period, the percentage of non-military, non-Medicare eligible persons who were uninsured at some point during the calendar year dropped from ~16% to an all-time low of approximately 8.8%, ranging from 2.8% in Massachusetts to 17.3% in Texas.2
Underinsured. On the flip side of the good news, the number of Americans whose out-of-pocket costs and deductibles are high for their incomes (defined as 5% to 10% of income excluding premiums) continues to rise for all insurance types and among all age groups. Specifically, between 2003 (the year data about the number of individuals who are underinsured began to be collected) and 2016, the percentage of adults 19 to 64 years of age who had insurance all year but were underinsured increased from 12% to 28%.3 Data from the Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Survey show in 2016, 24% of persons with employer-provided coverage and 44% of persons with individual coverage were underinsured, with rates ranging from 21% in California and New York to 32% in Florida and 33% in Texas.3
Out-of-pocket costs. Increasing deductibles and other out-of-pocket costs are one of the ways insurance companies and employers have been passing the ever-increasing costs of health care onto individuals, including older adults enrolled in some Medicare Advantage plans. The almost 1 in 3 Medicare enrollees choosing a Medicare Advantage plan from an insurance company may be surprised to learn they can have an out-of-pocket maximum of $6700 per year.4 Another reason Medicare and non-Medicare recipients need to increasingly scrutinize the fine print and footnotes in insurance plans is the increasing use of provider limitations. Although all plans have preferred and in- and out-of-network providers, some plans are much more restrictive than others. A relative newcomer to the non-Medicare market, the Exclusive Provider Organization (EPO) has attracted new enrollees with its low premiums, but they come with unpleasant consumer surprises.5 People generally know that HMOs typically do not cover out-of-network care; this is also true for EPOs.
Premiums. While average annual premium increases for employer-provided health insurance continue to outpace earnings, the steep increases seen at the beginning of this decade have leveled off somewhat, going from 78% between 2000 and 2006 to 37% from 2006 to 2012 (37%) and 25% between 2012 and 2018.6 Still, the year-over-year increases (combined with increasing out-of-pocket costs) and the predicted 5% increase for 2019 represent a substantial cost, especially for employees in lower-income groups. For the 20 million Americans who do not have employer-provided health insurance, uncertainty as direct result of administrative actions designed to repeal but not replace the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordability Act (also known as ACA or Obamacare) has become the new norm.7 During the first 5 years of the ACA (2011 to 2016), premiums in the individual market increased an average of 12% per year (considerably outpacing increases in earnings), but in 2017 and 2018 premiums increased an average of 23% per year.8 More recent administrative steps are designed to further erode the ACA by encouraging young, healthy individuals to obtain coverage outside the ACA marketplace which, in turn, is predicted to sharply increase premiums for people 50 to 64 years of age.7
Back to “the good old days.” The promotion of individual insurance plans that are outside the ACA market place and charge much lower premiums brings us right back to the importance of reading the fine print on policies, because these so-called short-term, limited-duration insurance plans are similar to the only plans persons in the individual market had access to in the past. They are called short-term policies because they are not automatically renewable and they are medically underwritten (if you have a health condition you can be turned down or charged higher premiums without limits), exclude coverage for pre-existing conditions, do not have to cover essential health benefits, impose lifetime and annual limits, and may require cost sharing (ie, you pay) in excess of $20 000 per person per policy period.9 In other words, these plans take us right back to “the good old days” of rescission (where your insurance would simply be discontinued if you were to become ill), running up against the lifetime limit if you experience a serious accident or health problem and all the other problems that caused millions of Americans to not have access to health insurance at all. These plans may save young and healthy people money ... as long as they do not need to use them.
Elephant in the room. At the heart of all the above-mentioned issues that cause us to worry as care providers to patients that may not be able to access or afford is the fact that the cost of health care in general in the United States continues to outpace all other developed nations on its unsustainable path to 20% of Gross Domestic Product.10 Some of the drivers of this trend include prescription drug costs (69% increase since 2000), hospital costs (60% increase since 2000), health care industry lobbying (doubled since 1998), and hospital consolidation.10Of course, the list is much longer and factors such as exorbitant administrative costs11 and billions of dollars in insurance company profits12 all add up. One way or another, everyone pays for it. So the real question is: Why do politicians talk so much about health insurance while ignoring the elephant in the room? Instead of endlessly talking about and tweaking insurance plans, trying to repeal the ACA, or adding more red tape, why not look at the real drivers of outcomes and costs and take real actions to improve both? There are ample data to show it is possible and can be done.10 Less talking and more doing to address the elephant in the room would be a welcome change for consumers and providers alike. We are tired of the never-ending changes to coverage options and restrictions, dealing with billing issues, calling insurance companies, collecting payments, working with patients who are unable to afford the deductibles, changes in their health plans they do not understand .... the list goes on and on. Wouldn’t it be nice to greet winter only with thoughts of the upcoming holidays? Put that on your holiday Wish List!
伤口世界平台生态圈,以“关爱人间所有伤口患者”为愿景,连接、整合和拓展线上和线下的管理慢性伤口的资源,倡导远程、就近和居家管理慢性伤口,解决伤口专家的碎片化时间的价值创造、诊疗经验的裂变复制、和患者的就近、居家和低成本管理慢性伤口的问题。
2019广东省医疗行业协会伤口管理分会年会
扫一扫了解详情:
任何关于疾病的建议都不能替代执业医师的面对面诊断。所有门诊时间仅供参考,最终以医院当日公布为准。
网友、医生言论仅代表其个人观点,不代表本站同意其说法,请谨慎参阅,本站不承担由此引起的法律责任。