版权归中华医学会所有。
未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章。
引用本文:简喜超, 简扬, 邓呈亮. 2025版《中国糖尿病足防治实践指南》解读[J]. 中华医学美学美容杂志, 2026, 32(2): 99-103. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114657-20251215-00266.
通信作者:邓呈亮,Email:该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。
Athina Stamati1 · Athanasios Christoforidis2
Received: 7 October 2024 / Accepted: 31 December 2024 / Published online: 10 January 2025 © The Author(s) 2025
Abstract
Aims To assess the efficacy and safety of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems compared to standard care in managing glycaemic control during pregnancy in women with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM).
Methods We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, registries and conference abstracts up to June 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing AID to standard care in pregnant women with T1DM. We con-ducted random effects meta-analyses for % of 24-h time in range of 63–140 mg/dL (TIR), time in hyperglycaemia (>140 mg/ dl and>180 mg/dL), hypoglycaemia (<63 mg/dl and<54 mg/dL), total insulin dose (units/kg/day), glycemic variability (%), changes in HbA1c (%), maternal and fetal outcomes.
Results Thirteen studies (450 participants) were included. AID significantly increased TIR (Mean difference, MD 7.01%, 95% CI 3.72–10.30) and reduced time in hyperglycaemia>140 mg/dL and>180 mg/dL (MD – 5.09%, 95% CI – 9.41 to – 0.78 and MD – 2.44%, 95% CI – 4.69 to – 0.20, respectively). Additionally, glycaemic variability was significantly reduced (MD – 1.66%, 95% CI – 2.73 to – 0.58). Other outcomes did not differ significantly.
Conclusion AID systems effectively improve glycaemic control during pregnancy in women with T1DM by increasing TIR and reducing hyperglycaemia without any observed adverse short-term effects on maternal and fetal outcomes.
Keywords Automated insulin delivery · Pregnancy · Type 1 diabetes mellitus · Systematic review · Meta-analysis
Anna Ericsson a,* , Karin Borgstrom¨ b,c , Christine Kumlien a,c,d , Magdalena Gershater Annersten a,c , Tautgirdas Ruzgas b,c , Johan Engblom b,c , Petri Gudmundsson b,c , Victoria Lazer a , Skaidre Jankovskaja b,c , Eva Lavant b,c , Sophia Ågren-Witteschus d , Sebastian Bjorklund ¨ b,d , Saman Salim e,f , Mikael Åstrom¨ g , Stefan Acosta f
a Department of Care Science, Faculty of Health and Society, Malm¨ o University, Malm¨ o, Sweden
b Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Health and Society, Malm¨ o University, Malm¨ o, Sweden
c Biofilms – Research Center for Biointerfaces, Malm¨ o University, Malm¨ o, Sweden
d Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malm¨ o, Sweden
e Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
f Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmo, ¨ Sweden
g StatCons, Sweden
ARTICLE INFO
Keywords: Diabetes mellitus Dry feet Prevention Foot-xerosis Self-care
ABSTRACT
Introduction: To minimize the risk of developing foot-ulcers, persons with diabetes are given the advice to daily inspect their feet and to apply skincare formulations. However, commercially available skincare products have rarely been developed and evaluated for diabetes foot care specifically. The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the effects in reducing foot xerosis in persons with diabetes without footulcers using two skincare creams containing different humectants (interventions) against a cream base nonhumectant (comparator). Secondary outcomes are to evaluate differences on skin barrier integrity, lowmolecular weight biomarkers and skin microbiota, microcirculation including transcutaneous oxygen pressure, degree of neuropathy, and HbA1c between intervention-comparator creams.
Methods: Two-armed double-blind RCT, registered in ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06427889. With 80 % power, two-tailed significance of 2.5 % in each arm, 39 study persons is needed in each arm, total 78 persons, 98 including dropouts, to be able to prove a reduction of at least one category in the Xerosis Severity Scale with the intervention creams compared to the comparator. In one arm, each participant will treat one foot with one of the intervention creams (Oviderm® or Canoderm®), while the opposite foot will be treated with the comparator cream (Decubal®lipid cream), twice a day. If needed, participants are enrolled after a wash-out period of two weeks. The participants will undergo examinations at baseline, day 14 and day 28.
Discussion: This RCT evaluate the potential effects of humectants in skin creams against foot xerosis in persons with diabetes.
Ha Young Park a , Min Ho Kang a , Guewha Lee b , Jin Woo Kim a,c,*
a Department of Food Science, Sunmoon University, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea
b Hu evergreen Pharm Inc., Incheon, Republic of Korea
c Center for Next-Generation Semiconductor Technology, Sun Moon University, Chungnam, Republic of Korea
Keywords: Ginseng non-edible callus Extracellular vesicle Skin regeneration Collagen synthesis Proliferation
1 . ABSTRACT
Background: This study aimed to investigate the effects of ginseng non-edible callus-derived extracellular vesicle (GNEV) on skin regeneration, particularly focusing on its impact on proliferation and migration in human dermal fibroblast (HDF).
Methods: GNEV was isolated from ginseng non-edible callus using sequential filtration and size exclusion chromatography (SEC). The extracellular vesicle was characterized using nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). HDF was treated with various concentrations of GNEV, and cell viability, proliferation, and migration were assessed using MTT and scratch wound healing assays. Gene expression related to collagen synthesis (TGF-β, SMAD-2, SMAD-3, COL1A1) was measured using RT-PCR.
Results: Treatment of HDF with GNEV resulted in a significant 2.5-fold increase in cell migration compared to the non-treated group. Furthermore, GNEV demonstrated the upregulation of collagen synthesis genes, specifically TGF-β, SMAD-2, SMAD-3, and COL1A1, by 41.7 %, 59.4 %, 60.2 %, and 21.8 %, respectively. These findings indicated that GNEV activates the TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway, showcasing its potential to induce skin
Conclusions: In conclusion, GNEV exhibits a notable ability to enhance skin regeneration through its stimulatory effects on cell migration and the upregulation of key collagen synthesis genes. The activation of the TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway further suggests the potential of GNEV as a promising candidate for drug delivery systems in the fields of cosmetics and pharmaceuticals, opening avenues for further research and application in skincare and dermatology
Diala Haykal
Centre Médical Laser Palaiseau, Palaiseau, France
Correspondence: Diala Haykal (该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。)
Received: 5 December 2024 | Accepted: 15 December 2024
Funding: The author received no specific funding for this work.
Keywords: cosmetic dermatology | genetic predisposition | personalized skincare | precision medicine | single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) profiling
Liang Chen1,2 | Fudi Wang3 | Xiaoyun Hu1,2 | Nihong Li1,2 | Ying Gao4 | Fengfeng Xue5 | Ling Xie1,2 | Min Xie1,2
1 Scientific Research Laboratory, Shanghai Le-Surely Biotechnology Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China |
2 SASELOMO Research Institute and Biological Laboratory, Shanghai Chuanmei Industrial Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China |
3 Evelab Insight (Singapore) Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore |
4 Zhejiang Moda Biotech Co. Ltd, Hangzhou, China |
5 Nanomedicine and Intestinal Microecology Research Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
Correspondence: Liang Chen (该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。) | Fengfeng Xue (该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。)
Received: 5 September 2024 | Revised: 25 December 2024 | Accepted: 24 January 2025
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Keywords: antiaging | baicalin | bio-vesicle | skin physiology and cell culture | transdermal delivery
伤口世界平台生态圈,以“关爱人间所有伤口患者”为愿景,连接、整合和拓展线上和线下的管理慢性伤口的资源,倡导远程、就近和居家管理慢性伤口,解决伤口专家的碎片化时间的价值创造、诊疗经验的裂变复制、和患者的就近、居家和低成本管理慢性伤口的问题。
2019广东省医疗行业协会伤口管理分会年会
扫一扫了解详情:
任何关于疾病的建议都不能替代执业医师的面对面诊断。所有门诊时间仅供参考,最终以医院当日公布为准。
网友、医生言论仅代表其个人观点,不代表本站同意其说法,请谨慎参阅,本站不承担由此引起的法律责任。