版权归中华医学会所有。
未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章。
引用本文:简喜超, 简扬, 邓呈亮. 2025版《中国糖尿病足防治实践指南》解读[J]. 中华医学美学美容杂志, 2026, 32(2): 99-103. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114657-20251215-00266.
通信作者:邓呈亮,Email:该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。
Athina Stamati1 · Athanasios Christoforidis2
Received: 7 October 2024 / Accepted: 31 December 2024 / Published online: 10 January 2025 © The Author(s) 2025
Abstract
Aims To assess the efficacy and safety of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems compared to standard care in managing glycaemic control during pregnancy in women with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM).
Methods We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, registries and conference abstracts up to June 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing AID to standard care in pregnant women with T1DM. We con-ducted random effects meta-analyses for % of 24-h time in range of 63–140 mg/dL (TIR), time in hyperglycaemia (>140 mg/ dl and>180 mg/dL), hypoglycaemia (<63 mg/dl and<54 mg/dL), total insulin dose (units/kg/day), glycemic variability (%), changes in HbA1c (%), maternal and fetal outcomes.
Results Thirteen studies (450 participants) were included. AID significantly increased TIR (Mean difference, MD 7.01%, 95% CI 3.72–10.30) and reduced time in hyperglycaemia>140 mg/dL and>180 mg/dL (MD – 5.09%, 95% CI – 9.41 to – 0.78 and MD – 2.44%, 95% CI – 4.69 to – 0.20, respectively). Additionally, glycaemic variability was significantly reduced (MD – 1.66%, 95% CI – 2.73 to – 0.58). Other outcomes did not differ significantly.
Conclusion AID systems effectively improve glycaemic control during pregnancy in women with T1DM by increasing TIR and reducing hyperglycaemia without any observed adverse short-term effects on maternal and fetal outcomes.
Keywords Automated insulin delivery · Pregnancy · Type 1 diabetes mellitus · Systematic review · Meta-analysis
Andrew Sharpe, Matt Allen and Naseer Ahmad
Diabetes is a pervasive and lifelong condition and poses significant challenges, with one of its most debilitating complications being foot diseases, particularly foot ulceration. This condition not only places individuals at risk for infection but also represents a precursor to severe consequences, such as sepsis and lower-limb amputation (Lipsky et al, 2023). This article delves into the multidisciplinary role that is pivotal in mitigating lower-limb foot ulcer recurrence, a pervasive issue affecting a substantial portion of the diabetic population.
Citation: Sharpe A, Allen M, Ahmad N (2023) Transformative strategies in diabetic foot care: a comprehensive approach to lower-limb ulcer recurrence. The Diabetic Foot Journal 26(2): 40–42
Key words
- Diabetic foot care
- Lower-limb foot ulcer recurrence
Article points
1. Diabetes puts individuals at risk for infection but also represents a precursor to severe consequences such as sepsis and lower-limb amputation.
2. The multidisciplinary role is crucial in mitigating lowerlimb foot ulcer recurrence, a pervasive issue affecting a substantial portion of the diabetic population.
3. In addition, a more active highrisk population could ultimately be a lower-risk population with reduced expected mortality rates.
Authors
Andrew Sharpe is Advanced Podiatrist, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK; NIHR ARC-GM PreDoctoral Academic Fellow; Matt Allen is Consultant Podiatrist, Salford Care Organisation, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK; Naseer Ahmad is Consultant Vascular Surgeon, Manchester University Foundation Trust and Clinical Director Manchester Amputation Reduction Strategy (MARS)
This advertorial has been developed, organised and funded by the Boehringer Ingelheim and Lilly Alliance for UK healthcare professionals.
Dr Rahul Mohan has received an honorarium to support the development of this advertorial.
Jardiance® (empagliflozin) Prescribing information and Adverse event reporting information for Great Britain and Northern Ireland can be found at the end of this document
Rahul Mohan
Dr Rahul Mohan, GP Partner and Principal, Ruddington Medical Centre, Nottingham, GP Lead for the Rushcliffe Community Diabetes Service, Committee Member of the Primary Care Diabetes Society.
Citation: Mohan R (2023) Practical guidance addressing the national shortage of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: From clinical experience. Diabetes & Primary Care 25: 101–4
This systematic review and meta-analysis of 126 randomised controlled trials, published in Diabetes Care, identified that the weekly dose of physical activity required to optimise glucose-lowering in people with type 2 diabetes is 1100 Metabolic Equivalents of Task (MET)-minutes per week, and this remained consistent across a wide range of baseline HbA1c values. This is the equivalent of 36 minutes per day of moderate-paced walking, 244 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity per week or 318 minutes of moderate strength training per week. Multicomponent activity (a mix of strength and aerobic activity), strength training and brisk walking were the most effective activities. Achieving the optimal weekly MET dose had greater effects in those with higher HbA1c at baseline, including up to a 1.02% reduction in those with an initial HbA1c >64 mmol/mol, and there was even a statistically significant 0.24–0.38% HbA1c reduction in those with prediabetes (HbA1c <48 mmol/mol) at baseline. These findings suggest that people with diabetes may need more physical activity than in the current generic recommendations of 150–300 minutes per week of moderate-intensity activity or 75–150 minutes per week of vigorous activity. Since we know that many do not achieve current recommendations consistently, helping people undertake these doses of physical activity is likely to need support from a multidisciplinary team, including exercise professionals and coaches, as well as from family and friends.
Pam Brown
GP in Swansea
Citation: Brown P (2024) Diabetes Distilled: Physical activity – how much is needed to optimise glycaemic control? Diabetes & Primary Care 26: [Early view publication]
Metformin use during initiation and titration of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) does not increase the frequency or severity of gut-related adverse events, or the likelihood of discontinuing the GLP-1 RA, according to this study published in Diabetes Care. Since gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events are common with both metformin and with GLP-1 RAs, data from four major clinical trials of liraglutide and subcutaneous and oral semaglutide were used to explore whether those treated with metformin suffered more GI side effects. The results suggest that pausing metformin therapy during GLP-1 RA initiation, as has been recommended by some, is not required. There was in fact a higher rate of GI adverse events and GLP-1 RA discontinuations in those not taking metformin, which the authors postulate could reflect an increased susceptibility to gut side effects with any drug. They recommend that increased counselling and consideration of slower titration may be helpful in this group. This is useful information to guide practice as a recently published National Drug Safety Alert states that supplies of oral semaglutide are now adequate to support new initiations of this drug, following the mandatory cessation of new initiations of any GLP-1 RA that has been in place since June 2023 due to manufacturing shortages.
Citation: Brown P (2024) Diabetes Distilled: Metformin does not increase risk of GI side effects during GLP-1 RA initiation and titration. Diabetes & Primary Care 26: [Early view publication]
Adrian Heald
The School of Medicine and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre; University of Manchester, Manchester, and Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford
Mike Stedman
The Research Office, Res Consortium, Andover
Frank Webb
Buxton Hospital, London Road, Buxton
Rena Francis
Michael Edmonds
King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London
George Dunn
Department of Podiatry, East Cheshire Trust, Macclesfield
Citation: Heald A, Stedman M, Webb F et al (2024) Making the most of the diabetes foot-screening appointment: Think Foot. Think kidney. Journal of Diabetes Nursing [Early view publication]
Andrew Hill
This article explores the growing role of artificial intelligence (AI) in patient self care in diabetes and considers the opportunities and risks associated with it in the context of foot self care in diabetes. AI has yielded many advances in individual and public health, although it does also present unique and emergent challenges. Certainly, AI enables us to consider and re-evaluate diabetes care, screening and management.
Hill A (2023) Is artificial intelligence the key to better foot self-care in diabetes? The Diabetic Foot Journal 26(2): 24–8
- Artificial intelligence
- Patient knowledge
- Self care
- Technology
1. Artificial intelligence has been shown to influence and improve certain aspects of diabetes care.
2. Self care and patient education are key to avoiding complications such as diabetic foot ulcers.
3. Artificial intelligence has as-yet unleashed potential in the field of foot self care and ulcer management, especially in the context of patient education and driving foot self-care behaviours.
Author
Andrew Hill is Senior Lecturer and Programme Lead The SMAE Institute.
伤口世界平台生态圈,以“关爱人间所有伤口患者”为愿景,连接、整合和拓展线上和线下的管理慢性伤口的资源,倡导远程、就近和居家管理慢性伤口,解决伤口专家的碎片化时间的价值创造、诊疗经验的裂变复制、和患者的就近、居家和低成本管理慢性伤口的问题。
2019广东省医疗行业协会伤口管理分会年会
扫一扫了解详情:
任何关于疾病的建议都不能替代执业医师的面对面诊断。所有门诊时间仅供参考,最终以医院当日公布为准。
网友、医生言论仅代表其个人观点,不代表本站同意其说法,请谨慎参阅,本站不承担由此引起的法律责任。