大湾区慢性创面医护康标准化体系建设联盟,《中国科技论文》体表外科卷编辑委员会,黄广涛1,吴 军1,郇京宁1,2
(1.深圳大学第一附属医院(深圳市第二人民医院)烧伤整形科,广东深圳518000;2.上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院烧伤整形与创面修复科,上海200011)
摘要:负压封闭引流技术(negative pressure wound therapy, NPWT)自2017年国内首部烧伤外科应用专家共识发布以来,其技术类型与临床应用范围均取得了显著拓展。特别是在促进各类急慢性创面愈合及预防外科手术部位感染方面,已累积了大量高质量循证证据。为整合国内外最新研究成果与临床实践经验,规范操作标准,提升治疗水平,国内创面修复相关多学科领域的专家共同撰写了本更新版共识。本共识汇聚了国内多位在创面相关的多学科领域的专家,结合国内外最新研究成果,遵循严谨的循证医学原则,采用系统综述方法,聚焦于NPWT的技术分类、适应症、参数优化及并发症处理等核心议题。工作小组系统检索了PubMed、Web of Science、IEEE Xplore及中国知网等数据库中2015—2025年相关文献,共获得791篇。经去重、筛选,并根据纳入标准(临床研究、随机对照试验、meta分析及相关共识等)最终纳入210篇文献进行证据综合与评价。本共识旨在为创面修复相关学科的临床医生提供基于最新证据、统一且可操作的治疗方案与技术规范。共识内容充分结合了我国临床实践的现状与需求,以期推动NPWT在国内的合理、规范及高效应用,最终惠及广大患者。
关键词:负压封闭引流技术;手术部位感染;创面修复;手术切口并发症
Yesica Y. Quiroz 1 , Enver Moncada 2 , Erika Llorens 3 , Ivan Schwartzmann 4 , Jorge Caffarati 5 , Anna Bujons *
Summary
Introduction
Paratesticular sarcoma is an aggressive malignant tumor of mesenchymal origin. The rhabdo-myosarcoma is the most common among children. Rhabdomyosarcoma treatment consists of surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Prognosic depends on local recurrence and distant metastasis.
Material and methods
We present the case of a 16-year-old male, who in April 2016 underwent right radical orchiectomy surgery by testicular mass rapidly evolving, with pathological results indicating a paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma. The extension study showed a precaval adenopathy suggestive of lymph node metastasis, therefore it was a high-grade rhabdomyosarcoma. There was an appropriate response after chemotherapy (Protocol EpSSG RMS2005) and we decided to perform a robotic.
Results
We performed a transperitoneal approach with 8 mm trocar and 12 mm optica trocar. We accessed the retroperitoneal space through a latero-colic incision. Then we performed a craniocaudal lymph node dissection until the aortic bifurcation. The surgical time was 240 min with a blood loss of 200 ml. There were no complications. The patient was discharged on the fourth day after surgery. Pathology showed metastasis of rhabdomyosarcoma without capsular rupture. After two months, we placed the left testicle into inguinal canal prior to radiotherapy.
Conclusions
Robotic lymph node metastasis lymphadenectomy from paratesticular sarcomas is a feasible treatment with the advantage of minimally invasive surgery and acceptable morbidity.
Authors
Kiran Kumar Chereddy
Issue: Volume 65 - Issue 7 - July 2019 ISSN 2640-5245
Login or Register to download PDF
Wound management is challenging; both public and private partners have been working tirelessly to find novel and advanced solutions. The ever-growing prevalence of chronic diseases such as diabetes has driven demand for care, particularly in developing nations. Unhealthy lifestyles and a deskbound work culture are expected to further increase the prevalence of chronic diseases, enhancing the call for a variety of new wound care products.1 This is luring many researchers and medical companies to develop innovative products or improve existing options.
An increasing understanding of wounds at the molecular level, the availability of technological devices that help visualize unreachable anatomical areas, and enhanced microscopic analysis of live tissues are leading to the development of better and more innovative wound care products that efficiently promote healing with minimal-to-no side effects. Novel solutions include, but are not limited to, different combinations of advanced drug delivery systems (from nano to macro scale) that are loaded or imbued with small drug molecules to large biomolecules, gene and cell therapies, and 3- dimensional, multilayered regenerative skin substitute models.2
Simple consumables such as gauzes, bandages, cleaning or cleansing solutions, and the like have less stringent regulations from health authorities and hence are widely available in different forms in the market. Complex decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds (derived from a variety of mammalian sources), electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds (made of biodegradable polymers), hydrogels, wafers, sponges, films, nano/micro drug delivery systems, and other dressings/devices have been loaded with healing agents, growth promoters, and/or biologicals (eg, growth factors, DNA) and tested for wound healing in animal models. Cell therapy strategies (eg, autologous macrophages, cultured skin cells, stem cells), skin graft techniques, live skin equivalents, bioengineered live skin equivalents (eg, dermal substitutes, bilayered skin substitute), and advanced medical devices also have been explored.3-5
From the pharmaceutical and medical device industrial (commercial) perspective, which are highly regulated industries, key questions to be addressed include: 1) Do the protocols and designs follow current good clinical/manufacturing practices and device design regulations, respectively? 2) Are the materials used or administered during the product approved by health authorities under current pharmaceutical or medical device regulations? 3) Do these products or devices permit further pharmaceutical or medical development in terms of safety, efficacy and stability? 4) Is the production process robust and reproducible? 5) Is it possible to scale-up the process for bulk manufacturing? 6) Is the product patient-friendly and/or should practitioners be involved? 7) Is the product/device applicable for different types of wounds? 8) Is the product or device commercially viable to produce to sustain, considering the competitive market and insurance coverage regulations? Answers to these questions require strong scientific data in order to get a green light from both health authorities and manufacturers. Many effective models and studies of advanced prototypes with exotic features and/or a high degree of complexity do not withstand unsurmountable hurdles to complete their clinical trial journey.6
Clinical trials not only provide the needed data for commercial approval and reimbursement, but they also provide valuable insights on how the wound care product interacts with wound physiology and overall on product safety. Researchers and medical companies realize the need for quality study designs and for joining forces to develop and test wound care products. In addition, huge investment in patient support programs is occurring that includes education and practical training to enhance the overall effectiveness of the wound care product or device. In the end, what developers, researchers, patients, and providers aim for is to find an effective, safe, and easy-to-use product. It is heartening to know that all involved parties are striving to ensure “novel” wound care is practical and available. The hope is that in the years to follow, more and more novel and efficient wound care prototypes developed by public-private partnerships will become viable, approved products and devices that fulfill patient and practitioner needs.
Affiliations
Dr. Chereddy is a Project Manager, Process Unit Project Management Office, Cell & Gene Technical Development & Manufacturing, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, Morris Plains, NJ. The opinions and statements expressed herein are specific to the respective authors and not necessarily those of Wound Management & Prevention or HMP. This article was not subject to the Wound Management & Prevention peer-review process.
伤口世界平台生态圈,以“关爱人间所有伤口患者”为愿景,连接、整合和拓展线上和线下的管理慢性伤口的资源,倡导远程、就近和居家管理慢性伤口,解决伤口专家的碎片化时间的价值创造、诊疗经验的裂变复制、和患者的就近、居家和低成本管理慢性伤口的问题。
2019广东省医疗行业协会伤口管理分会年会
扫一扫了解详情:
任何关于疾病的建议都不能替代执业医师的面对面诊断。所有门诊时间仅供参考,最终以医院当日公布为准。
网友、医生言论仅代表其个人观点,不代表本站同意其说法,请谨慎参阅,本站不承担由此引起的法律责任。