The skin acts as a barrier maintaining skin integrity and homeostasis against harmful pathogens and physical stressors. Wound healing is a complex and well-organized multistep process that takes place with the participation of cytokines, growth factors and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). It consists of a series of multiple stages, mainly hemostasis,inflflammation, proliferation and remodeling. The process of physiological hemostasis includes blood coagulation in the wound area and ends with the formation of a hemostatic plug. Thereafter, the inflflammation, serves different functions in the wound area, since it initiates thrombocyte degranulation and promotes the recruitment of neutrophils and monocytes for the removal of bacteria, dead cells and tissue debris and tissue repair. The cell migration process activated by fifibroblast growth factor (FGF) and transforming growth factor (TGF) is a fundamental step that precedes the subsequent formation of granulation tissue and extracellular matrix (ECM), which in turn induces proliferation and tissue remodeling [1]

       The excessive production or ineffificient detoxifification of reactive oxygen species (ROS), crucial regulators of the wound healing process, can potentially inflflict oxidative damage. Importantly, this is regarded as the main cause of chronic wounds [2]. In chronic wounds (such as diabetic foot ulcers, venous ulcers, bed sores), the healing time is slower due to several reasons such as the absence of ECM proteins, increased ROS production, deterioration of neovascularization, hypoxia, decreased collagen accumulation and reduced secretion of angiogenic growth factors [3,4]. Moreover, the imbalance between the production and degradation of growth factors by MMPs further contributes to prolonged the healing time.MMPs are endopeptidases that have the capacity to degrade all the components of the ECM. MMPs are secreted as proenzymes by many cell types, including lymphocytes and granulocytes, but in particular by activating macrophages [5]. MMPs are regulated by a family of inhibitors called the tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs), which are constitutively produced by a variety of cells. Changes in actual MMP activity are thus dependent on the balance between production and activation of MMPs and thelocal levels of TIMPs. In addition to the remodeling of the ECM as a result of increased MMP activity during wound healing, MMPs also regulates the cell–cell and cell–matrix signal by the release of various cytokines and growth factors in the ECM [6–9]. MMPs are crucial in all stages of wound healing as, in addition to the ECM remodeling, they also promote keratinocytes migration and re-epithelization [10]. In diabetic wounds, TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 mRNA and protein levels decrease while MMP-2 and MMP-9 mRNA and protein levels increase when compared to normal wounds [11]. This indicates that the balance between MMP and TIMP is maintained during the normal wound healing process while its disruption can lead to pathological events.

       The initial stage in fifighting invading pathogens and stimulating cellular signal transduction pathways in response to skin damage begins with the increased ROS production [12]. In response to an excessive ROS production within injured and inflflamed tissue,Nuclear factor E2 p45-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is synthesized to support wound repair [1].This suggests that the amount of ROS secreted from epithelial cells acts as a sensor for Nrf2 expression. In addition, ROS accumulation is required to prevent infections in the wound area [13]. Apart from ROS, nitric oxide (NO) as well as hydrogen sulfifide (H2S)-driven signaling can also play an important role through the modulation of the Nrf2 transcription factor [14].

       Nrf2/Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Nrf2/Keap1) is a crucial signaling pathway that protects against environmental stressors such as ROS, electrophilic and proteotoxic stress [15]. Nrf2 plays a key role in reducing cellular stress and restores redox homeostasis by regulating the expression of more than 1000 genes such as heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX1), thioredoxin (TRX), glutathione reductase (GSR), glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit (Gclc) and modififier subunit (Gclm), superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) and catalase [16,17]. In addition, Nrf2 signaling also takes part in the regulation of the cellular response to inflflammation by inhibiting inflflammation via suppression of pro-inflflammatory cytokines and controls fundamental cellular processes such as apoptosis, autophagy, angiogenesis, proliferation and cell migration [18,19]. Antioxidant enzymes, phase II and III detoxifification enzymes, proteases, chaperones, inflflammatory factors and growth factors are among the Nrf2 targets [20–22]. Among the Nrf2 activators, NO, small interfering RNA (siRNA), bee venom, as well as the administration of various active compounds have been reported as effective therapeutic approaches to promote wound healing [12].

       Apart from Nrf2, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) (in proliferation and differentiation), Smad proteins (in collagen expression, acceleration of wound healing) and Forkhead box protein N1 (FOXN1) (in re-epithelization) are other transcriptional regulators involved in wound healing. The transcription factor p53 plays a crucial role in cutaneous wound healing process [23,24]. It has been reported that p53, one of the most well-known tumor suppressor genes, also mediates the Nrf2 response. The role of p53 is dual. It acts as an antioxidant in moderate oxidative stress conditions to support cell survival. In contrast, it shows pro-oxidant activity under conditions associated with increasing cellular stress and triggers apoptosis. Therefore, p53 is involved in the expression of Nrf2 mediated antioxidant genes [4].

       Therefore, the present review will examine the structure of the Nrf2 transcription factor and its functional interactions and activation. Furthermore, the relationship between Nrf2 and wound healing as well as the consequences of Nrf2 induction in diabetic wound healing will be discussed in light of the most recent fifindings obtained from in vitro and in vivo studies.

Wound Healing Process

       Wound healing begins immediately after wound formation and developed in three distinct phases, each of them associated with complex and diverse processes including hemostasis, inflflammation, proliferation and maturation. In the hemostasis phase, the wound starts to be closed by clotting. Hemostasis begins just after blood leaks out of the body. At fifirst, blood vessels constrict in order to restrict the blood flflow. Then, the platelets coagulate to form a plug, while subsequently, a number of fifibrin strands start to adhere and promote the formation of a thrombus, which entraps the blood cells in the wounded area. The second stage of healing is the inflflammatory process, which starts immediately after blood vessels, and is characterized by an intense chemotaxis promoted by the leakage of a transudate that attracts the repair cells to the wounded site. This natural phase of the healing response is fifinalized to control bleeding and prevent infection by removal of damaged cells and pathogens. In this stage, the typical signs of the inflflammatory response known as heat, pain and redness, occur. While regarded as part of the physiological wound healing process, this phase can become detrimental if it prolongs or proceeds with excessive magnitude. In the proliferative phase, characterized by the formation of granulation tissue, new blood vessels and extensive re-epithelialization, the wound is rebuilt with extracellular matrix and collagen laid down by the fifibroblasts, and then it begins to contract as a consequence of myofifibroblasts activity. The granulation tissue is formed to provide suffificient oxygen and nutrients to achieve the optimal regeneration of the damaged tissue [25,26]. Afterwards, the re-epithelialization characterized by the intense proliferation and migration of keratinocytes towards the injury, progressively begins to resurface the lesion and concludes the proliferative phase of the wound process. The subsequent step, known as the maturation stage, is essentially a remodeling phase of the tissue wherein all the events activated in the earlier stages are markedly attenuated. In this stage, type III collagen is gradually replaced by type I collagen and the wound closes completely due to the crosslinking formation between the aligned collagen fifibers. As a result, the scar thickness is progressively reduced whilst the tensile strength of the tissue is increased.

       Given the complexity and the need for a sequential coordination of this multi-step process, failure in wound healing stages can lead to chronic wounds. Several factors can lead to impaired wound healing including hypoxia, ischemia- reperfusion injury, bacterial colonization and altered collagen synthesis caused by systemic illness or chronic conditions including malnutrition and smoking, as well as local factors such as pressure, tissue edema and dehydration. Due to the imbalance between the production and degradation of collagen and growth factors, chronic wounds take a prolonged time to heal. Neutrophil infifiltration to the wound site is regarded as an important factor for prolonged inflflammation. Macrophages and neutrophils increase matrix metalloproteinase production leading to extracellular matrix protein degradation [27].

       Recent studies have shown that natural-based or synthetic compounds possess notable advantages in terms of wound healing process modulation via Nrf2 signaling as detailed in further sections. Many Nrf2 activators have been reported to control oxidative stress by regulating the redox homeostasis, therefore leading to improved wound healing [12].

Gene Structure of Nrf2 Transcription Factor and Its Repressor Keap1

     Nrf2 is a basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor with Cap ‘n’ Collar (CNC)structure and interacts with the cysteine thiol groups of the protein Keap1 [28]. Keap1 acts as both an oxidative stress sensor and a regulator of the F-actin fifilament structure by virtue of its actin binding  property. Nrf2 consists of senven functional Nrf2-ECh homology domains (Neh1-Neh7)[29].The Neh1 domain provides the dimerization of Nrf2 with members of the musculoaponeurotic  fifibrosarcoma (Maf) protein and the DNA binding to the antioxidant response element (ARE) [30].The Neh2 domain mediates the binding of Keap1 protein and Nrf2, and contains two different motifs, known as DLG and ETGE. The Neh3 domain is associated with stabilization of the protein, while the Neh4 domain is responsible for histone acetylation. The Neh4 and Neh5 domains are  associated with transcriptional  activation and promote the binding to the cAMP response element binding protein (CREBP) The Neh6 domain contains a number of serine residues that are recognized and subsequently phosphorylated by the protein glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta(GSK3β) leading to KEAP1-independent Nrf2 degradation.Lastly the Neh7 is an interaction domain with the nuclear receptor retinoic X receptor alpha (RXRa), that negatively controls Nrf2 activity.The Keap1 protein consists of fifive domains, an N-terminal region(NTR), a Tramtrack and Bric-à-Brac (BTB) domain. a central intervening region (IVR) with repeats and a C-terminal domain (CTR) [31].The three domains,including,BTB,IVR and DGR domains,have binding sites. Highly reactive cysteine residues located within  these domains (Cys151 and Cys226 in BTB, Cys273 and Cys288 in IVR) act as biochemical sensors of tabolites such as succinate or methylglyoxal.The DGR domain mediates the interaction between Keap1 and Nrf2 and directly binds to the ETGE motif of the Neh2 domain (Figure 1) [32,33].

Figure 1.

       A schematic diagram of domain structures of Nrf2 and its repressor Keap1.Nrf2 consists of seven conserved domains known as Neh1-Neh7 and 605 amino acids.Neh1 interacts with small Maf (sMaf) proteins thanks to its Zip motif and thus binds to ARE sequences in DNA.The Neh2 domain contains two motifs called DLG and ETGE and interacts with the keap1 molecule.The Neh4 and Neh5 domains are the CBP binding sites.Neh6 is a serine-rich domain that is required for TrCP binding and regulates Nrf2 stability.Neh7 is required to bind RXRα and inhibits ARE gene activity.Keap1,rich in cysteine residues,consists of five domains known as NTR,BTB,INR,DGR,CTR and 624 amino acids. Keap1,rich in cysteine residues,consists of five domains konwn as NTR,BTB,INR,DGR,CTR and 624 amino acids.The BTB domain provides homodimerization of Keap1 and is the binding site for Cullin3(Cul3).The N-terminal region of the IVR domain mediates these functions and acts as a sensor for Nrf2 inducers .The Kelch/DGRdomain inhibits the multiple ubiquitination of Nrf2 by mediating of Nrf2 to the Neh2 domain.

Nrf2 Signaling: Mechanisms of Activation and Suppression

1.Canonical Activation of Nrf2

       Under physiological conditions, Keap1 forms a homodimer that binds to the ETGE and DLG motifs in the Neh2 domain of Nrf2 causing its cytoplasmic retention. Keap1 is a substrate adaptor protein for the Cul3-based E3–ligase complex for ubiquitination and degradation by the ubiquitin proteosome system (UPS). It is estimated that under homeostatic conditions Nrf2 has a half-life of only 20 min, suggesting that its constant degradation is required to prevent unnecessary activation of the cytoprotective response [22,34,35].

       By contrast, in the presence of cellular stress inducers such as ROS, xenobiotics and other electrophilic molecules, Nrf2 is unable to effificiently interact with the ubiquitin conjugating machinery due to a conformational change in the E3–ligase complex induced by the electrophilic modifification of specifific cysteines within Keap1 IVR or BTB domains [36]. Importantly, Keap1 is able to directly detect oxidative changes in the intracellular milieu thanks to the presence of redox-sensitive cysteine residues located within its regulatory domains that are subject to covalent modififications when Keap1 is exposed to electrophilic Nrf2-inducing chemicals such as hydrogen peroxide [37]. As a consequence, the inactive Keap1 molecules are progressively saturated by the pre-existing pool of Nrf2 while the neosynthesized Nrf2 molecules can escape Keap1 negative regulation and enter into the nucleus. Of note, Nrf2 can be activated by a number of different ARE inducers. Among them, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [38], NO [39], tertiary butylhydroquinone (tBHQ) [40], dimethyl fumarate (DMF) [41] as well as some phytochemicals (resveratrol, silymarin, sulforaphane, curcumin, cinnamic aldehyde etc.) [42] and bardoxolone methyl [43] are among the most well studied. They could protect the skin cells from UV damage and toxic chemicals. In addition, keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) and FGF, which are released by dermal fifibroblasts after wound formation, also promote Nrf2 expression [44]. Heme released from heme proteins is required for Nrf2 stabilization in case of damage [45]. Additionally, Nrf2 can be activated through mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and protein kinase C (PKC) signaling pathways in response to oxidative stress [46].

       After Nrf2 is released from Keap1 and translocated into the nucleus, it is dimerized with the sMaf protein and binds to the ARE. It further regulates the expression of antioxidant enzymes and genes encoding cell protective proteins such as NAD(P) H: quinone oxidoreductase (NQO)-1, glutathione reductase (GSR), glutathione-S transferase (GST), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) superoxide dismutases 1–3 (SOD1–3), glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit (GCLC), peroxiredoxins (PRX), thioredoxins (TRX), catalase (CAT), heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) and many others (Figure 2) [34,47].

2.Non-Canonical Activation of Nrf2: The Role of Autophagy

       A number of alternative regulators of Nrf2 activation have been described and are collectively ascribed in the non-canonical pathway of Nrf2 activation. This pathway comprises a number of different proteins such as DPP3, PALB2, BRCA1, p62 and p21, possessing the ability to disrupt the formation of the Keap1-Nrf2 complex by preventing their reciprocal interaction through competitive binding, thus promoting Nrf2 stabilization and activation [48]. Possibly, the most well-studied mechanism of the non-canonical pathway is linked to autophagy. Autophagy is a highly conserved process involving the reuse of long-lived proteins and building blocks that are released as a result of the breakdown of damaged organelles. This conserved mechanism contributes to the restoration of cellular homeostasis and is activated in response to specifific conditions such as nutrient scarcity, ROS overproduction, genomic instability, misfolded protein accumulation, organelle damage and microbial infection. Accumulating evidence also suggests that the autophagy mechanism can be triggered due to excessive ROS in cells. This mechanism allows misfolded or damaged proteins and damaged organelles to be broken down and reused for the cell purposes. Apart from this, it is also a vital defense mechanism in protecting against proteotoxicity induced by cellular redox stress [49]. Both autophagy and Nrf2/Keap1 have a protective role against oxidative stress (Figure 3).

Figure 2.

Nrf2 activation mechanism-canonical pathway.Under normal physiological conditions,Nrf2 forms a complex with the Krap1 protein Cul3 and Rbx,causing Nrf2 to be ubiquitinated and degraded by the ubiqutin proteasome system Under stress conditions,the Keap1 Cui3 compiex is deactivated.This situation leads to the relese and accumulation of Nrf2.Stable Nrf2 is translocated to the nucleus and binds to ARE together with small Maf proteins (sMaf).It ultimately activates antioxidant enzymes and cytoprotective proteins such as HO-1,NQO-1,GST.These enzymes suooort cellular defense by mediating the removal of ROS and cytotoxic electrophiles.

       In this pathway, p62 protein, which is an adapter protein that binds to ubiquitinated protein aggregates in autophagy and transmits it to autophagosomes. Upon serine phosphorylation within its 349-DPSTGE-354 motif, the p62 protein interacts with 3 arginines in the Kelch domain of Keap1, thus preventing or destabilizing Nrf2 binding. This further leads to Nrf2 stabilization and subsequent nuclear translocation inducing the transcription of several target genes [50]. Downmodulation of the p62 levels can thus restore the negative regulation of Keap1 and decrease Nrf2 stability [51–53].

5.Nrf2 Activation during Wound Healing

       The main role of Nrf2 in wound healing is to detect the ROS accumulation in injured and inflflamed tissues and to activate the antioxidant defense system [1]. Therefore, pharmacological induction of Nrf2 is an important therapeutic target in promoting healing after tissue damage and controlling repair-related inflflammation [54]. Nrf2 pathway plays a protective role against oxidative stress through the expression of antioxidative enzymes during wound healing [55,56]

       High ROS levels inhibit the proliferation of chondrocytes, stimulate apoptosis of osteocytes and increase bone resorption causing bone loss or delayed healing. Nrf2 transcription factor is expressed in many cell types including osteoblasts, osteocytes and osteoclasts. Lippross et al. showed that Nrf2 defificiency impairs normal fracture healing in Nrf2 knockout(KO, Nrf2−/−) mice [57]. Similarly, in Nrf2-KO mice, the absence of Nrf2 suppresses the expression of antioxidant enzymes in osteoblasts [58]. Although these results suggest a curative role of Nrf2 pathway during fracture healing, more studies are needed to better understand Nrf2 function in different bone cells [54].

      Many growth factors such as basic FGF and insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1) are responsible for modulating cellular responses after bone injury mediate fracture healing. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), one of the most crucial ones, promotes increased oxygenation in the injury site and initiates neovascularization. On the other hand, VEGF triggers osteoblast proliferation and migration [59]. Kweider et al. showed that VEGF activates Nrf2 in the BeWo cell line and enhances the levels of some antioxidant enzymes (thioredoxin, thioredoxin reductase and HO-1) [60]. However, this activation depends on the upstream induction of the ERK1/2 signal. These results confifirm that Nrf2 promotes fracture healing by inducing antioxidant responses to protect cells from damage caused by ROS in bone damage.

       During hemolysis, toxic-free heme is released by red blood cells. The conversion of heme to carbon monoxide and free iron is catalyzed by HO-1, which has an important immunomodulatory role. Indeed, it has been reported to have an anti-inflflammatory effect by increasing the release of cytokines such as interleukin 10 (IL 10) and IL1β. Inhibition of free heme release by hemolysis is triggered by HO-1 expression caused by Nrf2 activation. In K565 cells (human pro-erytroid cells), hemin causes the ubiquitination of Keap1 and promotes Nrf2 stabilization. Therefore, targeting of the Nrf2/Keap1 system has been proposed to prevent heme toxicity [61].

       Several reports have suggested that skin damage after UVB irradiation can lead to DNA modifification and ROS formation [62]. In these cases, pharmacological activation of Nrf2 could be an effective way of reducing UVB cytotoxicity. In transgenic mice, endogenous Nrf2 prevents ROS damage caused by UVB and apoptosis of keratinocytes by inducing the activation of cytoprotective genes [63]. Topical application of Nrf2 activators sulforaphane (SFN) has been shown to protect the skin against acute UV toxicity [28]. In the bleomycin (BLM)-induced skin fifibrous model, BLM was found to inhibit Nrf2 expression in the epidermis. However, Nrf2 defificiency in keratinocytes exacerbated skin fifibrosis. This defificiency could also be correlated with the increased expression levels of Mcp-1, IL-6 and IL-8 [64]. Additionally, the formulation named RTA408 was shown to increase the expression of Nrf2 target genes and mediate re-epithelization [65]. Based on these evidence,Nrf2 pathway has a remarkable impact on healing of wounds and may be benefificial in the treatment of chronic wounds. Selected studies targeting Nrf2 activation against tissue damage in different experimental models are given in Table 1.

6.The Role of Nrf2 in Cell Proliferation, Apoptosis and Migration during Wound Repair

       Nrf2 activation stimulates the proliferation and migration of epithelial cells during wound repair and inhibits apoptosis [66]. Loss of Nrf2 further slowed the epithelization  process in the STZ-induced diabetic mouse model. This suggests that the defificiency of Nrf2 also impairs angiogenesis due to long-term inflflammation and lack of neovascularization mediators. This is caused by the concomitant effects of increased apoptosis and oxidative damage accompanied by low TGF and high MMP levels. Nrf2 activation can be triggered by MMP9, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and genes associated with migration and proliferation that promote wound healing in perilesional skin tissue taken from diabetic and ulcer patients [67].

       Endothelial dysfunction represents a further underlying deterrent to wound healing,especially in diabetes. A number of studies have suggested that bone-marrow derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) contribute to postnatal neovascularization and vascular endothelial repair [68,69]. The number of circulating EPCs in humans [70] and in animals [71] with diabetes mellitus (DM) was reduced with a concomitant reduction in EPC functional ability (proliferation, colony formation, tube formation, self-renewal and mobilization) [72,73]. Recently, it has been reported that Nrf2 activation protects diabetic EPCs against the effects of oxidative stress and cell senescence, ameliorating the biological dysfunction of EPCs derived from mice with diabetes [74]. Thus, the targeting of endothelial dysfunction may represent another promising focus for future treatment of the diabetic wound with Nrf2 activators (Figure 4).

       Tumor suppressor protein p53, one of the most well-known apoptosis inducers, is also one of the sensors of oxidative stress. It also supports cell survival by acting as an antioxidant during cellular stress. p21 protein, another crucial protein participating to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induction, can affect the transcription of ARE genes. Schmidt et al. showed that cold plasma promotes Nrf2- and p53-mediated granulation and reepithelization in the skin of SKH1 mice. Levels of proinflflammatory cytokines IL-6 or TNFα and angiogenetic factors such as FGF, KGF, VEGF and COX2 increase in the early stages of wound healing and this increase depends on Nrf2 signal activation [4]. This observation also indicates that mild inflflammation is necessary to trigger wound healing [56].

      Recent studies have made signifificant contributions to elucidate the relationship between the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway and wound healing. However, some points still need to be clarifified. In particular, we know very little about the interaction and regulatory mechanisms between signal pathways that trigger autophagy and the Nrf2 signaling. In case of tissue damage and severe ROS production, Nrf2 mediates the prevention of apoptosis of keratinocytes caused by the activation of cytoprotective genes. It is well accepted that Nrf2 acts as a defense signal in the case of oxidative stress and plays a cell protective role by reducing ROS. However, there are studies showing that continuous activation of Nrf2 can also trigger tumorigenesis. Given the dualistic role of Nrf2, many factors such as the contribution of additional signaling pathways, activators and suppressors or even inflflammatory mediators should be taken into account to understand how the Nrf2 pathway regulates the wound healing activity. However, formulations to be developed using Nrf2 activators in acute or chronic wounds are seen as a promising treatment.

7.Nrf2 Induction of Cytoprotective Genes and Nrf2 Dependent Therapeutic Regimens in Wound Healing

       Besides the harmful effects caused by their excessive or prolonged production, ROS confer protection against pathogens and prevent infections in the wound area when present at low-moderate levels. Importantly, ROS are produced by both epithelial and migrating reparative cells (keratinocytes, macrophages, neutrophils). However, long-term inflflammation in unhealed chronic wounds and oxidative damage caused by excessive production of ROS impairs cell proliferation and leads to apoptosis [55].

      It is known that the wounds of diabetic individuals heal more slowly, while their neovascularization is largely impaired and even wounds can worsen much faster than nondiabetic counterparts. The main reason behind these alterations is strictly related to the existence of more severe oxidative stress conditions than those experienced by normoglycemic individuals. In vitro cell experiments showed that hyperglycemia treatment suppresses Nrf2 activation, resulting in oxidative stress with decreased expression of antioxidant genes, together with increased secretion of proinflflammatory cytokines [88]. The ARE is present in the regulatory regions of various genes encoding cytoprotective enzymes. ARE is activated by Nrf2 binding and is a promising therapeutic target to concomitantly stimulate wound healing via inflflammation and reduce the burden of oxidative stress in diabetic patients [89].

       Nrf2 activators have been reported as contributing to the fifight against several pathologic conditions, such as diabetes, Alzheimer disease, cardiovascular disease, diabetic foot ulcer and diabetic nephropathy. Cui et al. demonstrated that SFN treatment as NRF activator increased renal Nrf2 expression, prevented diabetic nephropathy and thereby attenuated both oxidative damage and fifibrosis in a diabetic mouse model [90]. tBHQ is another Nrf2 activator with strong oxidizing properties that binds to the cysteine residues of Keap1, causing Nrf2 stabilization [91]. On the other hand, SFN treatment leads to nuclear translocation and accumulation of Nrf2 and increases HO-1 and NQO-1 expressions in the diabetic retinopathy [84]. In STZ-induced diabetic rats, tBHQ treatment increases the expression of Nrf2 in macrophages and vascular smooth muscle cells in atherosclerotic lesions [92]. It is predicted that tBHQ can be an atheroprotective approach with promising applications in diabetes. In another study investigating the wound healing activity of syringic acid (SA), an Nrf2 activator, SA, was reported to reduce ischemia damage by triggering Nrf2 activation [93]. Ren et al. confifirmed that SA increases wound healing in diabetic rats. On the other hand, SA decreases the expression of Keap1 and increases the expression of antioxidative enzymes (SOD, CAT, GPx, GST, GR) [11]. However, after Nrf2 activator DMF treatment, oxidative stress decreased and diabetic wound healing increased signifificantly, while Nrf2 inhibitor ML385 mimicked the effect of diabetes [84]. In a recent study using a diabetic rat model, the wound area has been signifificantly improved with the use of exosomes of fat-derived stem cells (ADSCs) causing overexpression of Nrf2 [94]. However, a change in the Nrf2 gene might also render the wound area more vulnerable to complications of diabetes (such as nephropathy and retinopathy) [95]. There is a recent study investigating whether wound healing was triggered by lipopolysaccharide stimulated macrophage exosomes (LPS-Exos) in STZ-induced hyperglycemia rats. The results showed that LPS-Exos decreased ROS and MDA levels in the scar tissue of rats, as well as increased the production of SOD and GSH-Px. It also activates the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling. This effect of LPS-Exos can be considered as a novel pharmacological agent that can repair wound healing in diabetic rats [85].

       In the type I diabetic mouse model, the expression of collagen and p-defensin-2 genes is decreased compared to the control. The study investigating the effect of bee venom treatment on diabetic wound healing, showed that bee venom supports epithelial cell proliferation and migration by increasing Nrf2 expression [2]. In a study investigating the wound healing activity of plumbagin (a bioactive naphthoquinone isolated from Plumbago zeylanica L. roots), it was observed that plumbagin increased epithelization and collagen deposition. At the same time, plumbagin decreased the levels of inflflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), IL-6 and IL-1β in diabetic rats [96]. Therefore, plumbagin, with both anti-diabetic and anti-inflflammatory effects, can be used in the pharmacological activation of Nrf2 in the wound healing model. In another study evaluating the wound healing activity of neferine, an alkaloid obtained from the seeds of the lotus plant was investigated in a diabetic mouse wound model (10mm full-thickness wound on the dorsal skin). After the topical application of neferine (10% and 20% for 14 d), the level of ECM-related genes such as collagen-1, TGF-β and the increase in the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, CAT and GST accelerates wound healing [97].

       Additionally, it is already known that molecules such as NO and H2S contribute to wound healing. However, the role of H2S in re-epithelization during wound healing is not as clear as it is for NO. A recent study suggests that H2S is effective in controlling wound keratinocytes [14]. It was initially hypothesized that H2S-mediated Nrf2 regulation did not affect CK10 expression because the CK10 promoter did not contain the Nrf2 binding site. However, a binding site was later found in the CK10 promoter. Accordingly, H2S triggers the expression of cytokeratin 10 (CK10) in keratinocytes. However, additional studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms of the H2S-mediated Nrf2 regulation of CK10 expression. Lastly, Rabbani et al. found an effective way to successfully deliver the targeted siRNA against Keap1 by developing a liposome and protein hybrid nanoparticle formulation (lipoproteoplex (LPP)) in the Male diabetic Leprdb/db mouse model. As it is known, siRNAs are designed to target and degrade specifific mRNA transcripts. This practice has shown promising results in enhancing diabetic wound regeneration and improving redox homeostasis in the wound area [98]. Although the siRNA delivery system can be applied for diabetic wound treatment, additional clinical studies are required. Because 21–23 bp siRNA is susceptible to degradation by nucleases, this might represent a strong limitation to the effective delivery of a specifific siRNA into the cell.

      The studies mentioned so far have been oriented on the exploitation of the protective role of Nrf2 in cellular stress conditions such as ROS, electrophiles, and proteotoxic stress. However, according to some studies, Nrf2 activation can also potentially lead to undesired side effects. For example, prolonged activation of Nrf2 through the deletion of Keap1 was found to cause hyperkeratosis in murine skin [33]. Schäfer et al. similarly determined that long-term activation of Nrf2 in keratinocytes caused seborrhea in mice due to the upregulation of the growth factor epigen, which is considered a new Nrf2 target [99]. On the other hand, accumulating evidence also indicate that Nrf2 activation may even support tumorigenesis and malignant progression, thereby promoting unrestrained cell proliferation, cancer cells adaptation and therapy resistance in a number of solid and malignant tumors [100].

     Since Nrf2 activation is a potential approach for the clinical management of diabetic wound healing, chemical compounds could accelerate wound healing in Nrf2-dependent manner (Table 2). DMF, a well-proven potent Nrf2 activator, demonstrated attenuation of inflflammation and ROS production and thereby accelerated wound closure in a diabetic mouse model [101]. An advantage of DMF is its approval in clinical use for treatment in multiple sclerosis, which proves its safe nature. Similarly, other most well-known potent Nrf2 activators, sulforaphane and cinnamaldehyde, were shown to be effective against the diabetic wound healing in a mouse model [102]. Ketoconazole, an antifungal azole group compound, accelerates wound healing, which is directly correlated with the increase in the transcriptional Nrf2 activity and reduced inflflammatory response [103].

       Nrf2 activation in fifibroblasts is also induced by many natural compounds including polyphenols, such as curcumin, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) or apomorphine, and flflavone derivatives as well as many bioactive components of pepper beetle, brassica plants and walnut sprouts extracts [120]. Similarly, procyanidin B2, one of the major bioactive components of procyanidins promotes wound healing in diabetic mice in a Nrf2-dependent manner [86]. Curcumin, a potent Nrf2 activator, accelerated the cutaneous wound healing in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat model [121]. Treatment with Huangbai liniment, a traditional Chinese medicine, demonstrated acceleration of the wound closure and increase in the generation of extracellular matrix in a diabetic rat model via Nrf2 activation [122]. Neferine, an alkaloid present in lotus, signifificantly accelerates wound closure rate, followed by a decrease in the period of re-epitalization with a higher amount of collagen via Nrf2 signaling pathway [98]. On the other hand, berberine treatment remarkably accelerated wound healing and increased extracellular matrix synthesis via Nrf2 pathway [123]. Another Nrf2 activator, carnosol, signifificantly increased wound healing capacity in retinal epithelial cells [107]. In vitro and in vivo studies also suggest that treatment with the alkyl catechols, 4-ethyl catechol and 4-vinyl catechol, potent Nrf2 cofactors, are used traditionally for diabetic wound healing [35].

8.Conclusions

      Despite signifificant advances in therapeutic strategies used to accelerate the healing of wounds, there is still no practical cure for chronic wounds. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in antioxidant capacity of Nrf2. Several researchers have examined Nrf2-activating compounds to prevent and treat chronic inflflammatory and degenerative disorders. It has been revealed that Nrf2-inducing bioactive compounds that improve the wound healing process may be a promising therapeutic approach for treating chronic wounds. However, it is an important issue to investigate the safety of Nrf2 activators in specifific animal models and clinical trials before their applications in the medical practice.

Author Contributions: I.S. and L.S. were responsible for the conception and design of the review. I.S. and S.Ç. collected the literatures and summarized the results. I.S., S.Ç., and L.S. drafted the manuscript. E.P. (Emiliano Panieri) S.S., B.B., and E.P. (Elisabetta Profumo) revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding: This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.

Conflflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflflict of interest.

Abbreviations ADSCs adipose-derived stem cells ARE antioxidant response element BTB broad-complex, tramtrack and bric a brac bZIP basic leucine zipper CAT catalase CK10 cytokeratin 10 CNC cap ‘n’ collar COX2 cyclooxygenase 2 CREBP cAMP response element binding protein Cul3 cullin3 DGR double glycine repeat DMF dimethyl fumarate EGCG epigallocatechin-3-gallate

EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor

ECM Extracellular matrix

FGF fifibroblast growth factor

GCLC glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit

GPx glutathione peroxidase

GSR glutathione reductase

GST glutathione S-transferase

H2S hydrogen sulfifide

H2O2 hydrogen peroxide

HO-1 heme oxygenase 1

IL-10 interleukin 10

IL1β interleukin 1β

IL-6 interleukin 6

IVR intervening region

Keap1 kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1

KGF keratinocyte growth factor

Maf musculoaponeurotic fifibrosarcoma

MAPK mitogen-activated protein kinases

MMP matrix metalloproteinases

Neh Nrf2-ECh homology

NF-κB nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells

NO nitric oxide

NQO-1 NAD(P)H:quinone Oxidoreductase 1

Nrf2 nuclear factor E2 p45-related factor 2

PKC protein kinase C

ROS reactive oxygene species

RXRα retinoid X receptor α

SA syringic acid

SFN sulforaphane

siRNA small interfering RNA

SOD1-3 superoxide dismutase1-3

STZ streptozotocin

tBHQ tertiary butylhydroquinone

TF transcription factor

TGF-β transforming growth factor-β

TNFα tumor necrosis factor α

TrCP transducin repeat-containing protein

TRX thioredoxin

UPS ubiquitin proteasome system

VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor

References

1.Ambrozova, N.; Ulrichova, J.; Galandakova, A. Models for the study of skin wound healing. The role of Nrf2 and NF-κB. Biomed Pap. Med. Fac. Univ. Palacky. Olomouc. Czech. Repub. 2017, 161, 1–13. [CrossRef]

2.Hozzein, W.N.; Badr, G.; Badr, B.M.; Allam, A.; Ghamdi, A.A.; Al-Wadaan, M.A.; Al-Waili, N.S. Bee venom improves diabetic wound healing by protecting functional macrophages from apoptosis and enhancing Nrf2, Ang-1 and Tie-2 signaling. Mol. Immunol. 2018, 103, 322–335. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.Kasuya, A.; Tokura, Y. Attempts to accelerate wound healing. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2014, 76, 169–172. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.Schmidt, A.; von Woedtke, T.; Vollmar, B.; Hasse, S.; Bekeschus, S. Nrf2 signaling and inflflammation are key events in physical plasma-spurred wound healing. Theranostics 2019, 9, 1066–1084. [CrossRef]

5.Goetzl, E.J.; Banda, M.J.; Leppert, D. Matrix metalloproteinases in immunity. J. Immunol. 1996, 156, 1–4.

6.Hunninghake, G.W.; Davidson, J.M.; Rennard, S.; Szapiel, S.; Gadek, J.E.; Crystal, R.G. Elastin fragments attract macrophage precursors to diseased sites in pulmonary emphysema. Science 1981, 212, 925–927. [CrossRef]

7.Arribas, J.; Coodly, L.; Vollmer, P.; Kishimoto, T.K.; Rose-John, S.; Massague, J. Diverse cell surface protein ectodomains are shed by a system sensitive to metalloprotease inhibitors. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 11276–11282. [CrossRef]

8.Ito, A. Mukaiyama, A.; Itoh, Y.; Nagase, H.; Thøgersen, I.B.; Enghild, J.; Sasaguri, Y.; Moti, Y. Degradation of interleukin 1β by matrix metalloproteinases. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 14657–14660. [CrossRef]

9.Hooper, N.M.; Karran, E.H.; Turner, J. Membrane protein secretases. Biochem. J. 1997, 321, 265–279. [CrossRef]

10.Caley, M.P.; Martins, V.L.C.; O’Toole, E.A. Metalloproteinases and Wound Healing. Adv. Wound Care 2015, 4, 225–234. [CrossRef]

11.Ren, J.; Yang, M.; Xu, F.; Chen, J.; Ma, S. Acceleration of wound healing activity with syringic acid in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. Life Sci. 2019, 233, 116728. [CrossRef]

12.Hiebert, P.; Werner, S. Regulation of wound healing by the NRF2 transcription factor—More than cytoprotection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3856. [CrossRef]

13.Muzumdar, S.; Hiebert, H.; Haertel, E.; Ben-Yehuda Greenwald, M.; Bloch, W.; Werner, S.; Schäfer, M. Nrf2-mediated expansion of pilosebaceous cells accelerates cutaneous wound healing. Am. J. Pathol. 2019, 189, 568–579. [CrossRef]

14.Goren, I.; Köhler, Y.; Aglan, A.; Pfeilschifter, J.; Beck, K.F.; Frank, S. Increase of cystathionine-γ-lyase (CSE) during late wound repair: Hydrogen sulfifide triggers cytokeratin 10 expression in keratinocytes. Nitric. Oxide 2019, 87, 31–42. [CrossRef]

15.Uruno, A.; Yagishita, Y.; Yamamoto, M. The Keap1-Nrf2 system and diabetes mellitus. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2015, 566, 76–84. [CrossRef]

16.Malhotra, D.; Portales-Casamar, E.; Singh, A.; Srivastava, S.; Arenillas, D.; Happel, C.; Shyr, C.; Wakabayashi, N.; Kensler, T.W.; Wasserman, W.W.; et al. Global mapping of binding sites for Nrf2 identififies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profifiling and network analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 5718–5734. [CrossRef]

17.Ahmed, S.M.; Luo, L.; Namani, A.; Wang, X.J.; Tang, X. Nrf2 signaling pathway: Pivotal roles in inflflammation. Biochim. Biophys.

18.Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2017, 1863, 585–597. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Tonelli, C.; Chio, I.I.C.; Tuveson, D.A. Transcriptional regulation by Nrf2. Antioxid Redox Signal 2018, 1727–1745. [CrossRef]

19.Rojo de la Vega, M.; Chapman, E.; Zhang, D.D. Nrf2 and the hallmarks of cancer. Cancer Cell 2018, 34, 21–43. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

20.Ma, Q. Role of nrf2 in oxidative stress and toxicity. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2013, 53, 401–426. [CrossRef]

21.Chen, B.; Lu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Cheng, J. The role of Nrf2 in oxidative stress-induced endothelial injuries. J. Endocrinol. 2015, 225, R83–R99. [CrossRef]

22.Negi, C.K.; Jena, G. Nrf2, a novel molecular target to reduce type 1 diabetes associated secondary complications: The basic consederations. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 843, 12–26. [CrossRef]

23.Antoniades, H.N.; Galanopoulos, T.; Neville-Golden, J.; Kiritsy, C.P.; Lynch, S.E. p53 expression during normal tissue regeneration in response to acute cutaneous injury in swine. J. Clin. Investig. 1994, 93, 2206–2214. [CrossRef]

24.Vollmar, B.; El-Gibaly, A.M.; Scheuer, C.; Strik, M.W.; Bruch, H.P.; Menger, M.D. Acceleration of cutaneous wound healing by transient p53 inhibition. Lab. Investig. 2002, 82, 1063–1071. [CrossRef]

25.Eming, S.A.; Krieg, T.; Davidson, J.M. Inflflammation in wound repair: Molecular and cellular mechanisms. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2007, 127, 514–525. [CrossRef]

26.Gonzalez, A.C.; Costa, T.F.; Andrade, Z.A.; Medrado, A.R. Wound healing—A literature review. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2016, 91,614–620. [CrossRef]

27.Victor, P.; Sarada, D.; Ramkumar, K.M. Pharmacological activation of Nrf2 promotes wound healing. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2020,886, 173395. [CrossRef]

28.Dinkova-Kostova, A.T.; Holtzclaw, W.D.; Cole, R.N.; Itoh, K.; Wakabayashi, N.; Katoh, Y.; Yamamoto, M.; Talalay, P. Direct evidence that sulfhydryl groups of Keap1 are the sensors regulating induction of phase 2 enzymes that protect against carcinogens and oxidants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 11908–11913. [CrossRef]

29.Itoh, K.; Wakabayashi, N.; Katoh, Y.; Ishii, T.; Igarashi, K.; Engel, J.D.; Yamamoto, M. Keap1 represses nuclear activation of antioxidant responsive elements by Nrf2 through binding to the amino-terminal Neh2 domain. Genes. Dev. 1999, 13, 76–86.[CrossRef]

30.Yamamoto, M.; Kensler, T.W.; Motohashi, H. The KEAP1-NRF2 system: A thiol-based sensor-effector apparatus for maintaining redox homeostasis. Physiol. Rev. 2018, 98, 1169–1203. [CrossRef]

31.Saha, S.; Buttari, B.; Panieri, E.; Profumo, E.; Saso, L. An overview of Nrf2 signaling pathway and its role in inflflammation. Molecules 2020, 25, 5474. [CrossRef]

32.Zhang, D.D.; Hannink, M. Distinct cysteine residues in Keap1 are required for Keap1-dependent ubiquitination of Nrf2 and for stabilization of Nrf2 by chemopreventive agents and oxidative stress. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 23, 8137–8151. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

33.Wakabayashi, N.; Dinkova-Kostova, A.T.; Holtzclaw, W.D.; Kang, M.-I.; Kobayashi, A.; Yamamoto, M.; Kensler, T.W.; Talalay, P. Protection against electrophile and oxidant stress by induction of the phase 2 response: Fate of cysteines of the Keap1 sensor modifified by inducers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 2040–2045. [CrossRef]

34.Kwak, M.-K.; Wakabayashi, N.; Itoh, K.; Motohashi, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Kensler, T.W. Modulation of gene expression by cancer chemopreventive dithiolethiones through the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway. Identifification of novel gene clusters for cell survival. J. Biol.Chem. 2003, 278, 8135–8145. [CrossRef]

35.Senger, D.R.; Cao, S. Diabetic wound healing and activation of Nrf2 by herbal medicine. J. Nat. Sci. 2016, 2, e247.

36.Dinkova-Kostova, A.T.; Kostov, R.V.; Canning, P. Keap1, the cysteine-based mammalian intracellular sensor for electrophiles and Oxidants. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2017, 617, 84–93. [CrossRef]

37.Suzuki, T.; Muramatsu, A.; Saito, R.; Iso, T.; Shibata, T.; Kuwata, K.; Kawaguchi, S.; Iwawaki, T.; Adachi, S.; Suda, H.; et al. Molecular Mechanism of Cellular Oxidative Stress Sensing by Keap1. Cell Rep. 2019, 28, 746–758.e4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

38.Covas, G.; Marinho, H.S.; Cyrne, L.; Antunes, F. Activation of Nrf2 by H2O2 . In Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 157–171. [CrossRef]

39.Li, C.-Q.; Kim, M.Y.; Godoy, L.C.; Thiantanawat, A.; Trudel, L.J.; Wogan, G.N. Nitric oxide activation of Keap1/Nrf2 signaling in human colon carcinoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 14547–14551. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

40.Wu, K.; McDonald, P.; Liu, J.; Klaassen, C. Screening of natural compounds as activators of the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway. Planta Med. 2014 80, 97–104. [CrossRef]

41.Muri, J.; Wolleb, H.; Broz, P.; Carreira, E.M.; Kopf, M. Electrophilic Nrf2 activators and itaconate inhibit inflflammation at low dose and promote IL-1β production and inflflammatory apoptosis at high dose. Redox. Biol. 2020, 36, 101647. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

42.Houghton, C.A.; Fassett, R.G.; Coombes, J.S. Sulforaphane and other nutrigenomic nrf2 activators: Can the clinician’s expectation be matched by the reality? Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2016, 1–17. [CrossRef]

43.Lambers Heerspink, H.J.; Fioretto, P.; de Zeeuw, D. Pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and treatment of diabetic nephropathy. In National Kidney Foundation Primer on Kidney Diseases; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 222–234. [CrossRef]

44.Beer, H.D.; Gassmann, M.G.; Munz, B.; Steiling, H.; Engelhardt, F.; Bleuel, K.; Werner, S. Expression and function of keratinocyte growth factor and activin in skin morphogenesis and cutaneous wound repair. J. Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc. 2000, 5, 34–39.[CrossRef] [PubMed]

45.Braun, S.; Hanselmann, C.; Gassmann, M.G.; auf dem Keller, U.; Born-Berclaz, C.; Chan, K.; Kan, Y.W.; Werner, S. Nrf2 transcription factor, a novel target of keratinocyte growth factor action which regulates gene expression and inflflammation in the healing skin wound. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 22, 5492–5505. [CrossRef]

46.Wang, H.; Pan, L.; Xu, R.; Si, L.; Zhang, X. The molecular mechanism of Nrf2-Keap1 signaling pathway in the antioxidant defense response induced by BaP in the scallop Chlamys farreri. Fish Shellfifish Immunol. 2019, 92, 489–499. [CrossRef]

47.Wruck, C.J.; Götz, M.E.; Herdegen, T.; Varoga, D.; Brandenburg, L.-O.; Pufe, T. Kavalactones protect neural cells against amyloid β peptide-induced neurotoxicity via extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2-dependent nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 activation. Mol. Pharmacol. 2008, 73, 1785–1795. [CrossRef]

48.Silva-Islas, C.A.; Maldonado, P.D. Canonical and non-canonical mechanisms of Nrf2 activation. Pharmacol. Res. 2018, 134, 92–99.[CrossRef]

49.Dodson, M.; Redmann, M.; Rajasekaran, N.S.; Darley-Usmar, V.; Zhang, J. KEAP1–NRF2 signalling and autophagy in protection against oxidative and reductive proteotoxicity. Biochem. J. 2015, 469, 347–355. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

50.Bartolini, D.; Dallaglio, K.; Torquato, P.; Piroddi, M.; Galli, F. Nrf2-p62 autophagy pathway and its response to oxidative stress in hepatocellular carcinoma. Transl. Res. 2018, 193, 54–71. [CrossRef]

51.Lau, A.; Wang, X.-J.; Zhao, F.; Villeneuve, N.F.; Wu, T.; Jiang, T.; Sun, Z.; White, E.; Zhang, D.D. A noncanonical mechanism of nrf2 activation by autophagy defificiency: Direct interaction between Keap1 and p62. MCB 2010, 30, 3275–3285.[CrossRef] [PubMed]

52.Ichimura, Y.; Waguri, S.; Sou, Y.; Kageyama, S.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishimura, R.; Saito, T.; Yang, Y.; Kouno, T.; Fukutomi, T.; et al. Phosphorylation of p62 Activates the Keap1-Nrf2 Pathway during Selective Autophagy. Mol. Cell 2013, 51, 618–631. [CrossRef]

53.Hashimoto, K.; Simmons, A.N.; Kajino-Sakamoto, R.; Tsuji, Y.; Ninomiya-Tsuji, J. TAK1 Regulates the Nrf2 Antioxidant System Through Modulating p62/SQSTM1. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2016, 25, 953–964. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

54.Kubo, Y.; Wruck, C.J.; Fragoulis, A.; Drescher, W.; Pape, H.C.; Lichte, P.; Fischer, H.; Tohidnezhad, M.; Hildebrand, F.; Pufe, T.; et al. Role of Nrf2 in fracture healing: Clinical aspects of oxidative stress. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2019, 105, 341–352. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

55.Cano Sanchez, M.; Lancel, S.; Boulanger, E.; Neviere, R. Targeting oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in the treatment of impaired wound healing: A systematic review. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 98. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

56.Schmidt, A.; Bekeschus, S. Redox for repair: Cold physical plasmas and Nrf2 signaling promoting wound healing. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 146. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

57.Lippross, S.; Beckmann, R.; Streubesand, N.; Ayub, F.; Tohidnezhad, M.; Campbell, G.; Kan, Y.W.; Horst, F.; Sönmez, T.T.; Varoga, D.; et al. Nrf2 defificiency impairs fracture healing in mice. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2014, 95, 349–361. [CrossRef]

58.Sun, Y.-X.; Li, L.; Corry, K.A.; Zhang, P.; Yang, Y.; Himes, E.; Mihuti, C.L.; Nelson, C.; Dai, G.; Li, J. Deletion of Nrf2 reduces skeletal mechanical properties and decreases load-driven bone formation. Bone 2015, 74, 1–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

59.Hu, K.; Olsen, B.R. The roles of vascular endothelial growth factor in bone repair and regeneration. Bone 2016, 91, 30–38. [CrossRef]

60.Kweider, N.; Fragoulis, A.; Rosen, C.; Pecks, U.; Rath, W.; Pufe, T.; Wruck, C.J. Interplay between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor-2 (Nrf2): Implications for preeclampsia. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 42863–42872. [CrossRef]

61.Georgiou-Siafifis, S.K.; Tsiftsoglou, A.S. Activation of KEAP1/NRF2 stress signaling involved in the molecular basis of hemininduced cytotoxicity in human pro-erythroid K562 cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020, 175, 113900. [CrossRef]

62.Panich, U.; Sittithumcharee, G.; Rathviboon, N.; Jirawatnotai, S. Ultraviolet radiation-induced skin aging: The role of DNA damage and oxidative stress in epidermal stem cell damage mediated skin aging. Stem. Cells Int. 2016, 2016, 7370642. [CrossRef]

63.Schafer, M.; Dutsch, S.; auf dem Keller, U.; Navid, F.; Schwarz, A.; Johnson, D.A.; Johnson, J.A.; Werner, S. Nrf2 establishes a glutathione-mediated gradient of UVB cytoprotection in the epidermis. Genes. Dev. 2010, 24, 1045–1058. [CrossRef]

64.Wu, R.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, M.; Li, J.; Hu, Y.; Fu, J.; Pi, J.; Wang, H.; Xu, Y. Nrf2 in keratinocytes protects against skin fifibrosis via regulating epidermal lesion and inflflammatory response. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020, 174, 113846. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Rabbani, P.S.; Ellison, T.; Waqas, B.; Sultan, D.; Abdou, S.; David, J.A.; Cohen, J.M.; Gomez-Viso, A.; Lam, G.; Kim, C.; et al.

65.Targeted Nrf2 activation therapy with RTA 408 enhances regenerative capacity of diabetic wounds. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2018, 139, 11–23. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

66.Hayashi, R.; Himori, N.; Taguchi, K.; Ishikawa, Y.; Uesugi, K.; Ito, M.; Duncan, T.; Tsujikawa, M.; Nakazawa, T.; Yamamoto, M.; et al. The role of the Nrf2-mediated defense system in corneal epithelial wound healing. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013, 61, 333–342. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

67.Ayuk, S.M.; Abrahamse, H.; Houreld, N.N. The Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Diabetic Wound Healing in relation to Photobiomodulation J Diabetes Res. 2016, 2897656. [CrossRef]

68.Asahara, T.; Murohara, T.; Sullivan, A.; Silver, M.; van der Zee, R.; Li, T.; Witzenbichler, B.; Schatteman, G.; Isner, J.M. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science 1997, 275, 964–967. [CrossRef]

69.Zampetaki, A.; Kirton, J.P.; Xu, Q. Vascular repair by endothelial progenitor cells. Cardiovasc. Res. 2008, 78, 413–421. [CrossRef]

70.António, N.; Fernandes, R.; Soares, A.; Soares, F.; Lopes, A.; Carvalheiro, T.; Paiva, A.; Pêgo, G.M.; Providência, L.A.; Gonçalves, L.;et al. Reduced levels of circulating endothelial progenitor cells in acute myocardial infarction patients with diabetes or pre

71.Tsukada, S.; Masuda, H.; Jung, S.Y.; Yun, J.; Kang, S.; Kim, D.Y.; Park, J.H.; Ji, S.T.; Kwon, S.M.; Asahara, T. Impaired development and dysfunction of endothelial progenitor cells in type 2 diabetic mice. Diabetes Metab. 2017, 43, 154–162. [CrossRef] diabetes: Accompanying the glycemic continuum. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2014, 13, 1012014. [CrossRef]

72.Fadini, G.P.; Sartore, S.; Schiavon, M.; Albiero, M.; Baesso, I.; Cabrelle, A.; Agostini, C.; Avogaro, A. Diabetes impairs progenitor cell mobilisation after hindlimb ischaemia-reperfusion injury in rats. Diabetologia 2006, 49, 3075–3084. [CrossRef]

73.Ingram, D.A.; Lien, I.Z.; Mead, L.E.; Estes, M.; Prater, D.N.; Derr-Yellin, E.; DiMeglio, L.A.; Haneline, L.S. In vitro hyperglycemia or a diabetic intrauterine environment reduces neonatal endothelial colony-forming cell numbers and function. Diabetes 2008, 57, 724–731. [CrossRef]

74.Wang, R.Y.; Liu, L.H.; Liu, H.; Wu, K.F.; An, J.; Wang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Bai, L.J.; Qi, B.M.; Qi, B.L.; et al. Nrf2 protects against diabetic dysfunction of endothelial progenitor cells via regulating cell senescence. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2018, 42, 1327–1340. [CrossRef]

75.Florczyk, U.; Jazwa, A.; Maleszewska, M.; Mendel, M.; Szade, K.; Kozakowska, M.; Grochot-Przeczek, A.; Viscardi, M.; Czauderna, S.; Bukowska-Strakova, K.; et al. Nrf2 regulates angiogenesis: Effect on endothelial cells, bone marrow-derived proangiogenic cells and hind limb ischemia. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2014, 20, 1693–1708. [CrossRef]

76.Fresta, C.G.; Fidilio, A.; Caruso, G.; Caraci, F.; Giblin, F.J.; Leggio, G.M.; Salomone, S.; Drago, F.; Bucolo, C. A New Human Blood-Retinal Barrier Model Based on Endothelial Cells, Pericytes, and Astrocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1636. [CrossRef]

[PubMed]

77.Villarreal-Ponce, A.; Tiruneh, M.W.; Lee, J.; Guerrero-Juarez, C.F.; Kuhn, J.; David, J.A.; Dammeyer, K.; Mc Kell, R.; Kwong, J.;Rabbani, P.S.; et al. Keratinocyte-Macrophage Crosstalk by the Nrf2/Ccl2/EGF Signaling Axis Orchestrates Tissue Repair. Cell Rep. 2020, 33, 108417. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

78.Long, M.; Rojo de la Vega, M.; Wen, Q.; Bharara, M.; Jiang, T.; Zhang, R.; Zhou, S.; Wong, P.K.; Wondrak, G.T.; Zheng, H.; et al. An Essential Role of NRF2 in Diabetic Wound Healing. Diabetes 2016, 65, 780–793. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

79.Valcarcel-Ares, M.N.; Gautam, T.; Warrington, J.P.; Bailey-Downs, L.; Sosnowska, D.; de Cabo, R.; Losonczy, G.; Sonntag, W.E.; Ungvari, Z.; Csiszar, A. Disruption of Nrf2 signaling impairs angiogenic capacity of endothelial cells: Implications for microvascular aging. J. Gerontol. Series A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2012, 67, 821–829. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

80.Kuhn, J.; Sultan, D.L.; Waqas, B.; Ellison, T.; Kwong, J.; Kim, C.; Hassan, A.; Rabbani, P.S.; Ceradini, D.J. Nrf2-activating Therapy Accelerates Wound Healing in a Model of Cutaneous Chronic Venous Insuffificiency. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2020, 8, e3006. [CrossRef]

81.Chen, B.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, Q.; Yang, Y.; Niu, X.; Deng, Z.; Li, Q.; Wang, Y. Human embryonic stem cell-derived exosomes promote pressure ulcer healing in aged mice by rejuvenating senescent endothelial cells. Stem. Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 142. [CrossRef]

82.Chen, N.; Li, Y.; Huang, N.; Yao, J.; Luo, W.F.; Jiang, Q. The Nrf2 activator MIND4-17 protects retinal ganglion cells from high glucose-induced oxidative injury. J. Cell Physiol. 2020, 235, 7204–7213. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

83.Wu, J.; Sun, X.; Jiang, Z.; Jiang, J.; Xu, L.; Tian, A.; Sun, X.; Meng, H.; Li, Y.; Huang, W.; et al. Protective role of NRF2 in Macrovascular Complications of Diabetes. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2020, 16, 8903–8917.

84.Li, S.; Yang, H.; Chen, X. Protective effects of sulforaphane on diabetic retinopathy: Activation of the Nrf2 pathway and inhibition of NLRP3 inflflammasome formation. Exp. Anim. 2019, 68, 221–231. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

85.Li, D.; Wu, C.; Mao, L.; Gao, Z.; Xia, N.; Liu, C.; Mei, X. LPS-stimulated Macrophage Exosomes Inhibit Inflflammation by Activating the Nrf2/HO-1 Defense Pathway and Promote Wound Healing in Diabetic Rats. Res. Sq. 2020. [CrossRef]

86.Fan, J.; Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Zeng, J.; Tan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yu, X.; Li, W.; Wang, P.; Yang, Z.; et al. Procyanidin B2 improves endothelial progenitor cell function and promotes wound healing in diabetic mice via activating Nrf2. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 652–665. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

87.Soares, M.A.; Cohen, O.D.; Low, Y.C.; Sartor, R.A.; Ellison, T.; Anil, U.; Anzai, L.; Chang, J.B.; Saadeh, P.B.; Rabbani, P.S.; et al. Restoration of Nrf2 Signaling Normalizes the Regenerative Niche. Diabetes 2016, 65, 633–646. [CrossRef]

88.Li, M.; Yu, H.; Pan, H.; Zhou, X.; Ruan, Q.; Kong, D.; Chu, Z.; Li, H.; Huang, J.; Huang, X.; et al. Nrf2 suppression delays diabetic wound healing through sustained oxidative stress and inflflammation. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 1099. [CrossRef]

89.Zhao, C.R.; Gao, Z.H.; Qu, X.J. Nrf2-ARE signaling pathway and natural products for cancer chemoprevention. Cancer Epidemiol. 2010, 34, 523–533. [CrossRef]

90.Cui, W.; Bai, Y.; Miao, X.; Luo, P.; Chen, Q.; Tan, Y.; Rane, M.J.; Miao, L.; Cai, L. Prevention of diabetic nephropathy by sulforaphane: Possible role of Nrf2 upregulation and activation. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2012, 1–12. [CrossRef]

91.Magesh, S.; Chen, Y.; Hu, L. Small molecule modulators of Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway as potential preventive and therapeutic agents: Small molecule modulators of Keap1-Nrf2-are pathway. Med. Res. Rev. 2012, 32, 687–726. [CrossRef]

Lazaro, I.; Lopez-Sanz, L.; Bernal, S.; Oguiza, A.; Recio, C.; Melgar, A.; Jimenez-Castilla, L.; Egido, J.; Madrigal-Matute, J.;

92.Gomez-Guerrero, C. Nrf2 Activation provides atheroprotection in diabetic mice through concerted upregulation of antioxidant, anti-inflflammatory, and autophagy mechanisms. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 819. [CrossRef]

93.Güven, M.; Aras, A.B.; Topalo ˘glu, N.; Özkan, A.; ¸Sen, H.M.; Kalkan, Y.; Okuyucu, A.; Akbal, A.; Gökmen, F.; Co¸sar, M. The protective effect of syringic acid on ischemia injury in rat brain. Turk. J. Med. Sci. 2015, 45, 233–240. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

94.Li, X.; Xie, X.; Lian, W.; Shi, R.; Han, S.; Zhang, H.; Lu, L.; Li, M. Exosomes from adipose-derived stem cells overexpressing Nrf2 accelerate cutaneous wound healing by promoting vascularization in a diabetic foot ulcer rat model. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018, 50, 29. [CrossRef]

95.Xu, X.; Sun, J.; Chang, X.; Wang, J.; Luo, M.; Wintergerst, K.A.; Miao, L.; Cai, L. Genetic variants of nuclear factor erythroid-derived 2-like 2 associated with the complications in Han descents with type 2 diabetes mellitus of Northeast China. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2016, 20, 2078–2088. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

96.Shao, Y.; Dang, M.; Lin, Y.; Xue, F. Evaluation of wound healing activity of plumbagin in diabetic rats. Life Sci. 2019, 231, 116422. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

97.Li, J.; Chou, H.; Li, L.; Li, H.; Cui, Z. Wound healing activity of neferine in experimental diabetic rats through the inhibition of inflflammatory cytokines and nrf-2 pathway. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2020, 48, 96–106. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Rabbani, P.S.; Zhou, A.; Borab, Z.M.; Frezzo, J.A.; Srivastava, N.; More, H.T.; Rifkin, W.J.; David, J.A.; Berens, S.J.; Chen, R.; et al.

98.Novel lipoproteoplex delivers Keap1 siRNA based gene therapy to accelerate diabetic wound healing. Biomaterials 2017, 132, 1–15. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

99.Schäfer, M.; Willrodt, A.; Kurinna, S.; Link, A.S.; Farwanah, H.; Geusau, A.; Gruber, F.; Sorg, O.; Huebner, A.J.; Roop, D.R.; et al. Activation of Nrf2 in keratinocytes causes chloracne (MADISH)-like skin disease in mice. EMBO Mol. Med. 2014, 6, 442–457. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

100.Namani, A.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.J.; Tang, X. Modulation of NRF2 signaling pathway by nuclear receptors: Implications for cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell. Res. 2014, 1843, 1875–1885. [CrossRef]

101.Li, Y.; Ma, F.; Li, H.; Song, Y.; Zhang, H.; Jiang, Z.; Wu, H. Dimethyl fumarate accelerates wound healing under diabetic condition.J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2018, 61, 163–172. [CrossRef]

102.Long, M.; Cai, L.; Li, W.; Zhang, L.; Guo, S.; Zhang, R.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, M.; Zhou, X.; et al. DPP-4 Inhibitors improve diabetic wound healing via direct and indirect promotion of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and reduction of scarring. Diabetes 2018, 67, 518–531. [CrossRef]

103.Tsuji, G.; Takahara, M.; Uchi, H.; Matsuda, T.; Chiba, T.; Takeuchi, S.; Yasukawa, F.; Moroi, Y.; Furue, M. Identifification of ketoconazole as an AhR-Nrf2 activator in cultured human keratinocytes: The basis of its anti-inflflammatory effect. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2012, 132, 59–68. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

104.Xu, X.; Li, M.; Chen, W.; Yu, H.; Yang, Y.; Hang, L. Apigenin Attenuates Oxidative Injury in ARPE-19 Cells thorough Activation of Nrf2 Pathway. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 4378461. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

105.Schmidlin, C.J.; Rojo de la Vega, M.; Perer, J.; Zhang, D.D.; Wondrak, G.T. Activation of NRF2 by topical apocarotenoid treatment mitigates radiation-induced dermatitis. Redox Biol. 2020, 37, 101714. [CrossRef]

106.Buommino, E.; D’Abrosca, B.; Donnarumma, G.; Parisi, A.; Scognamiglio, M.; Fiorentino, A.; De Luca, A. Evaluation of the antioxidant properties of carexanes in AGS cells transfected with the Helicobacter pylori’s protein HspB. Microb. Pathog. 2017,108, 71–77. [CrossRef]

107.Foresti, R.; Bucolo, C.; Platania, C.M.; Drago, F.; Dubois-Randé, J.L.; Motterlini, R. Nrf2 activators modulate oxidative stress responses and bioenergetic profifiles of human retinal epithelial cells cultured in normal or high glucose conditions. Pharmacol Res. Commun. 2015, 99, 296–307. [CrossRef]

108.Balogun, E.; Hoque, M.; Gong, P.; Killeen, E.; Green, C.J.; Foresti, R.; Alam, J.; Motterlini, R. Curcumin activates the haem oxygenase-1 gene via regulation of Nrf2 and the antioxidant-responsive element. J. Biochem. 2003, 371, 887–895. [CrossRef]

109.Luo, Y.; Lu, S.; Dong, X.; Xu, L.; Sun, G.; Sun, X. Dihydromyricetin protects human umbilical vein endothelial cells from injury through ERK and Akt mediated Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway. Apoptosis 2017, 22, 1013–1024. [CrossRef]

110.Wu, C.C.; Hsu, M.C.; Hsieh, C.W.; Lin, J.B.; Lai, P.H.; Wung, B.S. Upregulation of heme oxygenase-1 by Epigallocatechin-3-gallate via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and ERK pathways. Life Sci. 2006, 78, 2889–2897. [CrossRef]

111.Sun, Y.; Xiu, C.; Liu, W.; Tao, Y.; Wang, J.; Qu, Y.I. Grape seed proanthocyanidin extract protects the retina against early diabetic injury by activating the Nrf2 pathway. Exp. Ther. Med. 2016, 11, 1253–1258. [CrossRef]

112.Zou, X.; Feng, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wertz, K.; Weber, P.; Fu, Y.; Liu, J. Stimulation of GSH synthesis to prevent oxidative stress-induced apoptosis by hydroxytyrosol in human retinal pigment epithelial cells: Activation of Nrf2 and JNK-p62/SQSTM1 Pathways. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2012, 23, 994–1006. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

113.He, M.; Pan, H.; Chang, R.C.; So, K.F.; Brecha, N.C.; Pu, M. Activation of the Nrf2/HO-1 antioxidant pathway contributes to the protective effects of Lycium barbarum polysaccharides in the rodent retina after ischemia-reperfusion-induced damage. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e84800. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

114.Zhou, J.; Ma, X.; Cui, Y.; Song, Y.; Yao, L.; Liu, Y.; Li, S. Methyleugenol protects against t-BHP-triggered oxidative injury by induction of Nrf2 dependent on AMPK/GSK3β and ERK activation. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 135, 55–63. [CrossRef]

115.Schanuel, F.S.; Saguie, B.O.; Monte-Alto-Costa, A. Olive oil promotes wound healing of mice pressure injuries through NOS-2 and Nrf2. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2019, 44, 1199–1208. [CrossRef]

116.Ungvari, Z.; Bagi, Z.; Feher, A.; Recchia, F.A.; Sonntag, W.E.; Pearson, K.; de Cabo, R.; Csiszar, A. Resveratrol confers endothelial protection via activation of the antioxidant transcription factor Nrf2. American journal of physiology. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2010, 299, H18–H24. [CrossRef]

117.Tian, R.; Yang, W.; Xue, Q.; Gao, L.; Huo, J.; Ren, D.; Chen, X. Rutin ameliorates diabetic neuropathy by lowering plasma glucose and decreasing oxidative stress via Nrf2 signaling pathway in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 771, 84–92. [CrossRef]

118.Feng, Z.; Liu, Z.; Li, X.; Jia, H.; Sun, L.; Tian, C.; Jia, L.; Liu, J. α-Tocopherol is an effective Phase II enzyme inducer: Protective effects on acrolein-induced oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in human retinal pigment epithelial cells. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2010, 21, 1222–1231. [CrossRef]

119.Heyninck, K.; Sabbe, L.; Chirumamilla, C.S.; Szarc Vel Szic, K.; Vander Veken, P.; Lemmens, K.; Lahtela-Kakkonen, M.; Naulaerts, S.; Op de Beeck, K.; Laukens, K.; et al. Withaferin A induces heme oxygenase (HO-1) expression in endothelial cells via activation of the Keap1/Nrf2 pathway. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2016, 109, 48–61. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

120.Gegotek, A.; Skrzydlewska, E. The role of transcription factor Nrf2 in skin cells metabolism. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2015, 307,385–396. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

121.Kant, V.; Gopal, A.; Pathak, N.N.; Kumar, P.; Tandan, S.K.; Kumar, D. Antioxidant and anti-inflflammatory potential of curcumin accelerated the cutaneous wound healing in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2014, 20, 322–330.[CrossRef]

122.Zhang, J.; Zhou, R.; Xiang, C.; Jia, Q.; Wu, H.; Yang, H. Huangbai liniment accelerated wound healing by activating Nrf2 signaling in diabetes. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 4951820. [CrossRef]

123.Zhou, R.; Xiang, C.; Cao, G.; Xu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, H.; Zhang, J. Berberine accelerated wound healing by restoring TrxR1/JNK in diabetes. Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 2021, 135, 613–627. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecules Medicinal Chemistry Reviews 2021