文献精选
Charley Samler
Citation: Samler C (2022) Creating a culture of curiosity: How to promote effective safeguarding in the diabetes team and beyond. Diabetes Care for Children & Young People 11: [Early view publication]
Article points
1. There is a need for a shared definition and understanding of how to practice professional curiosity at an inter-agency level.
2. Professional curiosity and inter-agency working rely on one another to thrive.
3. The children and Young Person’s diabetes clinic presents a unique opportunity to practice professional curiosity.
4. Professional curiosity needs to be embedded within all Health and Social Care Professionals’ core training.
5. There is a need for regular safeguarding supervision and simulated workshops to promote ongoing practice of professional curiosity.
Key words
- Diabetes clinic - Inter-agency collaboration - Professional curiosity - Respectful uncertainty - Safeguarding supervision
Authors
Charley Samler is Children’s Diabetes Nurse Specialist, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton.
The National Wound Care Strategy Programme (NWCSP) seeks for improvement in the care of patients with wounds (The National Wound Care Strategy Programme — Lower Limb Recommendations, 2020). The recommendations offer a clear framework for the development for local delivery in clinical care settings. The Skin Integrity Team at Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (DBTH) developed clinical pathways through collaboratively system leadership with the Doncaster Place Wound Care Alliance, ensuring secondary care was included and potential and historical barriers overcome, to implement the NWCSP recommendations. Here we describe the process of the translating national recommendations into clinical pathway and the issues that led to the development of a secondary care focused version.
KEY WORDS Chronic wounds Lower leg National Wound Care Strategy Programme (NWCSP) Secondary care Wounds
KELLY MOORE Skin Integrity Lead Nurse, Doncaster and Bassetlaw teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
This article explores medical-device related pressure ulcers (MDRPU) in an intensive care unit (ICU) at the Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust (RUH). The data presented outlines a reduction in PU of 66% over a 6-year period and a reduction in MDRPU of 50% over the same period. MDRPU were particularly challenging to prevent in ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic, where there were additional numbers of patients in the ICU with medical devices in place. Additionally, during the COVID-19 pandemic, an increased number of patients in the ICU were nursed prone (face down), adding additional pressure on the facial structure, a range of measures were put in place to avoid those avoidable MDRPU in the ICU at the RUH. Measures focused on skin checking, offloading and rotation of devices, including endotracheal tubes, non-invasive ventilation, nasogastric (NG) and nasojejunal (NJ) tubes and catheters. A specific comfort and pressure care record was developed for ICU to record the assessments of these at risk areas.
KEY WORDS Pressure ulcer Device-related pressure ulcer DRPU Medical-device related pressure ulcers
NICOLA HEYWOOD Tissue Viability Nurse Specialist, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust.
STEPHANIE WORTHINGTON Tissue Viability Nurse and Critical Care Sister, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust.
MICHAELA ARROWSMITH Lead Tissue Viability Nurse, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust.
MARGI JENKINS Matron, Critical Care Services, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust.
LAURA HERRING Tissue Viability Nursing Assistant, Royal United Hospitals NHS Foundation
Pamela Chen1,2,3* , Keryln Carville4 , Terry Swanson5 , Peter A. Lazzarini6,7, James Charles8 , Jane Cheney9, Jenny Prentice10 and on behalf of the Australian Diabetes-related Foot Disease Guidelines & Pathways Project11,12
Abstract
Background: Diabetes-related foot ulceration (DFU) has a substantial burden on both individuals and healthcare systems both globally and in Australia. There is a pressing need for updated guidelines on wound healing interventions to improve outcomes for people living with DFU. A national expert panel was convened to develop new Australian evidence-based guidelines on wound healing interventions for people with DFU by adapting suitable international guidelines to the Australian context.
Methods: The panel followed National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) procedures to adapt suitable international guidelines by the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) to the Australian context. The panel systematically screened, assessed and judged all IWGDF wound healing recommendations using ADAPTE and GRADE frameworks for adapting guidelines to decide which recommendations should be adopted, adapted or excluded in the Australian context. Each recommendation had their wording, quality of evidence, and strength of recommendation re-evaluated, plus rationale, justifications and implementation considerations provided for the Australian context. This guideline underwent public consultation, further revision and approval by ten national peak bodies.
* Correspondence: 该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。 3 Joondalup Health Campus, Ramsay Healthcare Australia, Perth, Australia Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© Diabetes Feet Australia 2022 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Results: Thirteen IWGDF wound healing recommendations were evaluated in this process. After screening, nine recommendations were adopted and four were adapted after full assessment. Two recommendations had their strength of recommendations downgraded, one intervention was not currently approved for use in Australia, one intervention specified the need to obtain informed consent to be acceptable in Australia, and another was reworded to clarify best standard of care. Overall, five wound healing interventions have been recommended as having the evidence-based potential to improve wound healing in specific types of DFU when used in conjunction with other best standards of DFU care, including sucrose-octasulfate impregnated dressing, systemic hyperbaric oxygen therapy, negative pressure wound therapy, placental-derived products, and the autologous combined leucocyte, platelet and fibrin dressing. The six new guidelines and the full protocol can be found at: https:// diabetesfeetaustralia.org/new-guidelines/
Conclusions: The IWGDF guideline for wound healing interventions has been adapted to suit the Australian context, and in particular for geographically remote and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. This new national wound healing guideline, endorsed by ten national peak bodies, also highlights important considerations for implementation, monitoring, and future research priorities in Australia.
Keywords: Diabetes-related foot ulcer, Diabetic foot, Foot ulcer, guideline, Recommendations, Treatment, Wound healing, Wound treatment.
