伤口世界
  • 首页
  • 病情图文
    • 糖尿病足
    • 压疮
    • 感染伤口
    • 造口
    • 溃疡
      • 动脉性溃疡
      • 静脉性溃疡
      • 放射性溃疡
    • 烧伤
    • 创伤
    • 少见伤口
    • 祛疤止痒
    • 皮肤病
  • 医师讲座
  • 名医介绍
    专业服务
    • 糖尿病足
    • 压疮
    • 造口
    • 溃疡
    • 烧伤
    蔡道章院长

    Custom Mod Mega1

    主任医师、教授、博导,南方医科大学第三附属医院(广东省骨科医院)院长

    • 中德骨科伤口管理学校校长
    • 广东省骨科研究院运动医学研究所所长
    • 广东省内运动医学专业唯一的博士研究生导师
    • 美国哈弗大学医学院骨科访问学者
    • 专业特长处于省内领先、国内或国际先进水平以上
    • 2018年获得“国之名医卓越建树”荣誉称号
    • 2017年被评为全国卫生计生系统先进工作者、广东省医学领军人才
    • 中国医师协会运动医师分会副会长
    • STCOT中国部运动医学分会副主任委员
    • 广东省医学会关节外科分会主任委员
    • 广东省医学会运动医学会分会名誉主任委员
    • 独立承担过国家“863”课题,主持过10余项省、部级科研项目
    • 多份专业杂志编委
  • 文献精选
    伤口分类
    • 糖尿病足
    • 压疮
    • 感染伤口
    • 造口
    • 溃疡
    • 烧伤
    • 更多关于伤口信息
    最新文献
    • Evidence-based recommendations for the use of continuous glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes: the Italian guidelines 2026-06-01 00:00

      A.Giaccari1 · G. Gliozzo1  · G. Ciccarelli1  · G. Di Giuseppe1  · C. Castellano2  · S. Cum3  · L. Delle Monache4,13 · M. Gallo5  ·M.Lastretti6 · G. Medea7  · M. Monesi8  · R. Napoli9  · B. Pintaudi10 · E. Succurro11 · G. Turchetti

      Received: 9 January 2026 / Accepted: 17 March 2026 © The Author(s) 2026

      Abstract

      Background and aims Although continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices are now standard of care among Type 1 diabetes patients, they are still relatively underutilized in Type 2 diabetes (T2D), particularly in those patients not treated with insulin. Widespread adoption continues to be hindered by a combination of factors. Chief among these is the scarcity of long-term, large-scale clinical trials demonstrating the benefits of the use of CGM in T2D. This meta-analysis aimed to address this gap by comparing CGM with self-blood glucose monitoring (SBMG), with primary outcomes of HbA1c and time in range (TIR) in insulin-treated and non-insulin-treated TD2 patients.

      Methods and results Following the stringent rules mandated by our National Health Service (which requires a panel com-posed of all stakeholders involved in diabetes treatment, and includes PICO, GRADE, AGREE, and meta-analyses), we performed a systematic review of RCTs that enrolled two groups of individuals with T2D, those treated with insulin (includ-ing basal and basal-bolus regimens), and those receiving treatments other than insulin. All included trials compared CGM with structured blood glucose monitoring (SBGM) with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as the main endpoint. Based on the strength and consistency of the evidence, the panel issued a strong recommendation in favor of CGM for individuals with T2D treated with insulin (including those on basal insulin alone) and for individuals with T2D not treated with insulin, par-ticularly for those with glycated hemoglobin levels≥7%. From a pharmacoeconomic perspective, outcomes were positive in both patient groups.

      Conclusion CGM represents a clinically effective and cost-efficient approach to optimizing glycemic control in T2D, becom-ing mandatory among individuals on insulin therapy. Our findings support a shift in clinical practice toward the more widespread use of CGM in T2D, with regulatory frameworks and reimbursement policies needing to adapt accordingly.

      Keywords CGM · Type 2 Diabetes · Metanalysis · PICO · GRADE · Guidelines

      Communicated by Massimo Federici, M.D.

      A. Giaccari 该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。

      1 Center for Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS and Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

      2 Azienda USL of Modena, Sassuolo Hospital, Sassuolo, Italy

      3 Diabetes and Diabetic Foot Care Unit, ASUGI, Monfalcone, Italy

      4 National Board Member of FAND (Italian Association for the Rights of Diabetic People), Roma, Italy

      5 Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, AO SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy

      6 Order of Psychologists of Lazio, Rome, Italy

      7 Italian Society of General Medicine (SIMG), Florence, Italy

      8 Territorial Diabetology Unit, AUSL Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

      9 Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy

      10 Diabetes Unit, Niguarda Cà Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy

      11 Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy

      12 Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy

      13 Patient Advocacy Lab, ALTEMS – Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

    • 【指南与共识】2025版《中国糖尿病足防治实践指南》解读 2026-05-30 00:00

      原创 邓呈亮 中华医学美学美容杂志

       
       2026年4月2日 20:00 河北 5人

      版权归中华医学会所有。

      未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章。

      引用本文:简喜超, 简扬, 邓呈亮. 2025版《中国糖尿病足防治实践指南》解读[J]. 中华医学美学美容杂志, 2026, 32(2): 99-103. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114657-20251215-00266.

      通信作者:邓呈亮,Email:该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。

  • 互动快递
  • 首页
  • 病情图文
    • 糖尿病足
    • 压疮
    • 感染伤口
    • 造口
    • 溃疡
      • 动脉性溃疡
      • 静脉性溃疡
      • 放射性溃疡
    • 烧伤
    • 创伤
    • 少见伤口
    • 祛疤止痒
    • 皮肤病
  • 医师讲座
  • 名医介绍
    • 专业服务
      • 糖尿病足
      • 压疮
      • 造口
      • 溃疡
      • 烧伤
    • 蔡道章院长
  • 文献精选
    • 伤口分类
      • 糖尿病足
      • 压疮
      • 感染伤口
      • 造口
      • 溃疡
      • 烧伤
      • 更多关于伤口信息
    • 最新文献
  • 互动快递
  • 当前位置: 
  • 首页
  • 文献精选

文献精选

LITERATURE REVIEW  An Observational, Prospective Cohort Pilot Study to Compare the Use of Subepidermal Moisture Measurements Versus Ultrasound and Visual Skin Assessments for Early Detection of Pressure Injury

LITERATURE REVIEW An Observational, Prospective Cohort Pilot Study to Compare the Use of Subepidermal Moisture Measurements Versus Ultrasound and Visual Skin Assessments for Early Detection of Pressure Injury

伤口世界,
2019-11-07 00:00
发布于 文献精选
1180 Views
0 Comment

Authors

Amit Gefen

WOUND CARE IN THE FIRST PERSON  Wound Care in the First Person: Taking the Guess Work Out of Silver Use

WOUND CARE IN THE FIRST PERSON Wound Care in the First Person: Taking the Guess Work Out of Silver Use

伤口世界,
2019-11-07 00:00
发布于 文献精选
1430 Views
0 Comment

Authors

Igor Zilberman

EMPIRICAL STUDIES  Outcomes of a Quality Improvement Program to Reduce Hospital-acquired Pressure Ulcers in Pediatric Patients

EMPIRICAL STUDIES Outcomes of a Quality Improvement Program to Reduce Hospital-acquired Pressure Ulcers in Pediatric Patients

伤口世界,
2019-11-07 00:00
发布于 文献精选
1352 Views
0 Comment

Authors

Vitaliya Boyar

Keywords

SPECIAL TO OWM  Why Continence Care: The Importance of Including Continence Care in Your Wound Care Practice

SPECIAL TO OWM Why Continence Care: The Importance of Including Continence Care in Your Wound Care Practice

伤口世界,
2019-11-07 00:00
发布于 文献精选
1434 Views
0 Comment

Authors

Nancy A. Faller

Elizabeth A. LaGro

  • 首页
  • 317
  • 318
  • 319
  • 320
  • 321
  • 322
  • 323
  • 324
  • 325
  • 326
  • 末页
第322页 共479页

Categories

  • 病情图文
  • 文献精选
  • 名医介绍
  • K2 Content
  • Evidence-based recommendations for the use of continuous glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes: the Italian guidelines 2026-06-01 00:00

    A.Giaccari1 · G. Gliozzo1  · G. Ciccarelli1  · G. Di Giuseppe1  · C. Castellano2  · S. Cum3  · L. Delle Monache4,13 · M. Gallo5  ·M.Lastretti6 · G. Medea7  · M. Monesi8  · R. Napoli9  · B. Pintaudi10 · E. Succurro11 · G. Turchetti

    Received: 9 January 2026 / Accepted: 17 March 2026 © The Author(s) 2026

    Abstract

    Background and aims Although continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices are now standard of care among Type 1 diabetes patients, they are still relatively underutilized in Type 2 diabetes (T2D), particularly in those patients not treated with insulin. Widespread adoption continues to be hindered by a combination of factors. Chief among these is the scarcity of long-term, large-scale clinical trials demonstrating the benefits of the use of CGM in T2D. This meta-analysis aimed to address this gap by comparing CGM with self-blood glucose monitoring (SBMG), with primary outcomes of HbA1c and time in range (TIR) in insulin-treated and non-insulin-treated TD2 patients.

    Methods and results Following the stringent rules mandated by our National Health Service (which requires a panel com-posed of all stakeholders involved in diabetes treatment, and includes PICO, GRADE, AGREE, and meta-analyses), we performed a systematic review of RCTs that enrolled two groups of individuals with T2D, those treated with insulin (includ-ing basal and basal-bolus regimens), and those receiving treatments other than insulin. All included trials compared CGM with structured blood glucose monitoring (SBGM) with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as the main endpoint. Based on the strength and consistency of the evidence, the panel issued a strong recommendation in favor of CGM for individuals with T2D treated with insulin (including those on basal insulin alone) and for individuals with T2D not treated with insulin, par-ticularly for those with glycated hemoglobin levels≥7%. From a pharmacoeconomic perspective, outcomes were positive in both patient groups.

    Conclusion CGM represents a clinically effective and cost-efficient approach to optimizing glycemic control in T2D, becom-ing mandatory among individuals on insulin therapy. Our findings support a shift in clinical practice toward the more widespread use of CGM in T2D, with regulatory frameworks and reimbursement policies needing to adapt accordingly.

    Keywords CGM · Type 2 Diabetes · Metanalysis · PICO · GRADE · Guidelines

    Communicated by Massimo Federici, M.D.

    A. Giaccari 该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。

    1 Center for Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS and Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

    2 Azienda USL of Modena, Sassuolo Hospital, Sassuolo, Italy

    3 Diabetes and Diabetic Foot Care Unit, ASUGI, Monfalcone, Italy

    4 National Board Member of FAND (Italian Association for the Rights of Diabetic People), Roma, Italy

    5 Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, AO SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy

    6 Order of Psychologists of Lazio, Rome, Italy

    7 Italian Society of General Medicine (SIMG), Florence, Italy

    8 Territorial Diabetology Unit, AUSL Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

    9 Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy

    10 Diabetes Unit, Niguarda Cà Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy

    11 Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy

    12 Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy

    13 Patient Advocacy Lab, ALTEMS – Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

  • 【指南与共识】2025版《中国糖尿病足防治实践指南》解读 2026-05-30 00:00

    原创 邓呈亮 中华医学美学美容杂志

     
     2026年4月2日 20:00 河北 5人

    版权归中华医学会所有。

    未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章。

    引用本文:简喜超, 简扬, 邓呈亮. 2025版《中国糖尿病足防治实践指南》解读[J]. 中华医学美学美容杂志, 2026, 32(2): 99-103. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114657-20251215-00266.

    通信作者:邓呈亮,Email:该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。

  • Automated insulin delivery in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2026-05-30 00:00

    Athina Stamati1  · Athanasios Christoforidis2

    Received: 7 October 2024 / Accepted: 31 December 2024 / Published online: 10 January 2025 © The Author(s) 2025

    Abstract

    Aims To assess the efficacy and safety of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems compared to standard care in managing glycaemic control during pregnancy in women with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM).

    Methods We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, registries and conference abstracts up to June 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing AID to standard care in pregnant women with T1DM. We con-ducted random effects meta-analyses for % of 24-h time in range of 63–140 mg/dL (TIR), time in hyperglycaemia (>140 mg/ dl and>180 mg/dL), hypoglycaemia (<63 mg/dl and<54 mg/dL), total insulin dose (units/kg/day), glycemic variability (%),  changes in HbA1c (%), maternal and fetal outcomes.

    Results Thirteen studies (450 participants) were included. AID significantly increased TIR (Mean difference, MD 7.01%, 95% CI 3.72–10.30) and reduced time in hyperglycaemia>140 mg/dL and>180 mg/dL (MD – 5.09%, 95% CI – 9.41 to – 0.78 and MD – 2.44%, 95% CI – 4.69 to – 0.20, respectively). Additionally, glycaemic variability was significantly reduced (MD – 1.66%, 95% CI – 2.73 to – 0.58). Other outcomes did not differ significantly.

    Conclusion AID systems effectively improve glycaemic control during pregnancy in women with T1DM by increasing TIR and reducing hyperglycaemia without any observed adverse short-term effects on maternal and fetal outcomes.

    Keywords Automated insulin delivery · Pregnancy · Type 1 diabetes mellitus · Systematic review · Meta-analysis

Popular Tags

  • 糖尿病足
  • 造口
  • 溃疡
  • 动脉性溃疡
  • 静脉性溃疡
  • 放射性溃疡
  • 烧伤
  • 创伤
  • 祛疤止痒
  • 皮肤病

伤口世界平台生态圈,以“关爱人间所有伤口患者”为愿景,连接、整合和拓展线上和线下的管理慢性伤口的资源,倡导远程、就近和居家管理慢性伤口,解决伤口专家的碎片化时间的价值创造、诊疗经验的裂变复制、和患者的就近、居家和低成本管理慢性伤口的问题。

 

消息订阅

关注伤口世界动态,了解专业领域最新科技
Copyright © 2026 中诺医疗. All Rights Reserved
皖ICP备19014494号-1

学术会议

2019广东省医疗行业协会伤口管理分会年会

扫一扫了解详情:

 

  • 2019年6月15日 中国广州
  • 主办单位:广东省医疗行业协会伤口管理分会

伤口世界提示

任何关于疾病的建议都不能替代执业医师的面对面诊断。所有门诊时间仅供参考,最终以医院当日公布为准。

网友、医生言论仅代表其个人观点,不代表本站同意其说法,请谨慎参阅,本站不承担由此引起的法律责任。