Bronte Jeffrey1,2*, Logan Gardner6,7, Michelle Le1 , Julie Frost1 and Ming Wei Lin1,3,4,5
*Correspondence: Bronte Jeffrey 该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。
1 Department of Clinical Immunology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
2 St Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
3 Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
4 Department of Immunopathology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
5 Centre for Immunology and Allergy Research, Westmead Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
6 Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
7 School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
© The Author(s) 2025. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
İbrahim Halil Aydoğdu | Esen Özkaya Department of Dermatology and Venereology, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey
Correspondence: İbrahim Halil Aydoğdu (该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。)
Received: 26 April 2025 | Revised: 14 June 2025 | Accepted: 30 June 2025
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Keywords: allergic contact dermatitis | carbamate | epidemiology | glove | mercapto | nonoccupational | occupational | patch test | rubber additives | thiuram
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2025 The Author(s). Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
ABSTRACT
Background: Rubber additives are common causes of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) worldwide, yet data from Turkey remain
Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of rubber additive sensitisation and its clinical/occupational relevance in a tertiary re ferral centre.
Methods: A retrospective study on 2687 consecutively patch-tested patients with rubber additives at our allergy unit between 1996 and 2023.
Results: Rubber sensitisation was found in 10.6%, with a slight increase after 2010. Male predominance was noted (female: male=1:2.3). Thiurams and carbamates were the most frequent sensitizers. ACD was diagnosed in 7.9%, primarily caused by gloves (85.5%). Hands were most commonly affected (94.4%). Logistic regression analysis showed that thiuram and carba mate sensitisation was significantly associated with hand eczema, while benzothiazole derivatives were linked to foot eczema. Airborne ACD occurred in 4.2%, mainly in healthcare workers. Hand eczema with and without wrist extension was observed with similar frequency. Occupational ACD accounted for 79.3% of cases, especially among construction (56.8%) and healthcare workers (14.8%), with a relative increase in the latter group after 2015.
Conclusions: The high prevalence of sensitisation from rubber gloves is concerning. Legal measures are urgently needed, includ ing safer additives and clearer glove labelling. Patch testing remains essential, even without the classic glove-pattern distribution.
原创：伤口治疗及造口护理中心
不管哪种肤质，哪怕是“天生丽质”的人，都会存在或多或少的小毛病，每种不同的肤质可能出现的问题也各有侧重，当皮肤出现问题时就应该警醒了，应该立即审视和调整你的计划，那么我们应该如何科学评估自己的皮肤？今天小编就告诉大家医生及伤口师是如何评估我们的皮肤的。
皮肤是作为人类健康与美丽的象征，当我们最初注意到一个人时，她健康的肌肤往往是形成美好的第一印象的重要因素。
健康与美丽是分不开的，尤其是对皮肤来说，这一点更加重要，如果没有了健康，便根本谈不上皮肤的美丽。
在日常的工作、学习、生活中，难免会有磕磕碰碰，时不时我们的身体就是因某些原因，造成不可避免的伤口出现。有时我们会发现，有些伤口会快速愈合甚至不留痕迹，而有些伤口经久不愈甚至情况愈演愈烈，造成不可挽回的后果，只有我们能够简单的初步认识伤口的各种情况，才能更好地对待我们所发生的一些伤口情况，使其快速愈合，让我们的身体恢复健康。
今天，小编就给大家讲解一下什么是伤口以及伤口的分类。
在日常生活中，当我们的机体受到伤害而造成伤口的时候，最希望伤口能够尽快愈合，恢复到未受伤时候的状态。通过观察不难发现，伤口几乎是一天一个样，那么机体是如何让伤口产生这些变化的呢？伤口有时如何进行修复的呢？
今天小编就告诉大家伤口的愈合过程，通过了解这个过程，我们能够更好地了解自己伤口所处在的周期，以及能够大概了解伤口是往好的方向发展还是往坏的方向恶化。话不多说，下面介绍今天的主题！
伤口世界平台生态圈，以“关爱人间所有伤口患者”为愿景，连接、整合和拓展线上和线下的管理慢性伤口的资源，倡导远程、就近和居家管理慢性伤口，解决伤口专家的碎片化时间的价值创造、诊疗经验的裂变复制、和患者的就近、居家和低成本管理慢性伤口的问题。
2019广东省医疗行业协会伤口管理分会年会
扫一扫了解详情:
任何关于疾病的建议都不能替代执业医师的面对面诊断。所有门诊时间仅供参考，最终以医院当日公布为准。
网友、医生言论仅代表其个人观点，不代表本站同意其说法，请谨慎参阅，本站不承担由此引起的法律责任。
